CESI in Belgrade: Strengthening gender equality in Serbia and the healthcare sector

Emmanuel Macron is the winner of the first round of the French Presidential elections and is expected to become France’s next President. However, assuming (and, needless to say, hoping) that Mr Macron will beat Marine Le Pen in the second round on May 7, it still needs to be established what this means for worker rights, a more social Europe and, to this end, much needed additional investment in social infrastructure and public services – something CESI has been advocating for long.

As Mr Macron is a committed European, the French (and German) elections may open momentum for a new Berlin-Paris agreement for ambitious reforms in Europe.

At their Rome Summit in March, EU leaders already committed to a more social and inclusive Europe, something that CESI welcomed warmly. It will remain to be seen to what extent and in which way Mr Macron’s understanding of reforms in Europe spans to a more social Europe and an adjusted macroeconomic and fiscal governance framework which allows Member States to make much-needed investments in human capital, accessible and affordable quality public services and the workers providing them.

As CESI’s Presidium declared in a resolution in response to the European Commission’s recent White Paper on the Future of the EU, heads of state and government and national politicians in the Member States should close ranks with trade unions all over Europe in their call to put the development of a real social dimension at the heart of a successful future EU: Social and economic fairness and equality has become the most important concern of the EU’s citizens. They will only accept a European integration project which responds to their needs. If Emmanuel Macron internalises this paradigm, he could help make Europe a better place for citizens and workers – In any case, though, this is course requires in the first place a (hopefully clear) victory against Le Pen in the election’s second round two weeks’ time.

On March 29 2017, Brexit became a reality. Britain’s ambassador to the EU, Tim Barrow, handed the UK’s official letter of withdrawal from the EU over to European Council President Tusk.

On 24^th of June 2016, the Brexit vote let the EU into a deep shock, and it seems, so did the official letter launching the exit procedure.

Personally, I welcome the decision to opt for a clear (and hard) Brexit.

Of course, the UK and the EU will face troubled times, of course the challenges of how to manage Britain’s exit from the EU will be enormous, of course the legal and administrative defiance of its completion within two years will be almost incommensurable, and of course the economic and political shockwaves of unknown magnitude are still to come.

But lavishing in uncertainty would have helped no one.

The leader of the EPP group in the European Parliament, Manfred Weber, tweeted: “From now on, only the interests of the remaining 440 million Europeans count for us!”

While the wording might appear slightly sulky, he is right: If the 27-member union does not want gamble away all its chances at a convincing new beginning with greater acceptance and support for European integration, it will have to clearly define its relations with and own interests towards Britain. And with such letter, the lines are clear.

Yes, the Brexit is certainly more than unfortunate. What is true also is that the Brexit negotiations will absorb a lot of resources of the EU during the next two years.

At the same time, in fields in which UK governments have often been difficult partners – such as in employment and social affairs- prospects for real progress may be improving. For the remaining EU-27 this requires a clear will to strive for further unity, and the will to clearly display that unity. CESI’s Presidium underlined in its latest statement that, while being aware that democratic legitimacy and mandating mainly occurs through traditional democratic channels at national levels, “it is also time for all political actors to be ready to put Europe first – not as a goal in itself but in the very interest of the citizens.”

For CESI, it most and foremost adds up to the completion of the EMU in terms of a real social dimension. If necessary, by the means of the European Commission’s recent White Paper’s scenario 3: ‘Those who want more do more’.

As Fabian Zuleeg and Janis Emmanouilidis from the European Policy Centre (EPC) state in a recent commentary, “a new reform momentum will require, first and foremost, an agreement between Berlin and Paris.”

Picture: CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger © CESI 2017

The recent financial and economic crisis has resulted in a social crisis, with sharply rising socioeconomic inequalities in Member States across the European Union. The Rome Declaration commits Member States and institutions to a social Europe where addressing unemployment, poverty and social exclusion are priorities and where sustainable growth reduces inequalities. Social Platform, the European Confederation of Independent Trade Unions (CESI) and Eurodiaconia welcome this commitment to social Europe but warn Member States and the European institutions that this ambition can only be achieved if there is greater momentum and mechanisms for social investment in European Economic Governance.

There are inherent economic returns and advantages in social investment. Economies with more social investment have shown to be more resilient to shocks and perform better in crises. Adequately resourced social protection systems can work as automatic stabilisers and maintain positive effects on demand. Furthermore improved social cohesion prevents tremendous economic costs of inequalities in the long-run. It also generates social and economic returns as it enables people to be more socially and economically productive. The benefits of social investment clearly align with the Rome Declaration pledge for a social Europe that fights poverty, social exclusion, unemployment and discrimination.

However, there are limitations in the EU economic governance framework that will prevent such pledges being fulfilled. Levels of social investment have been persistently low across Member States; to date the EU has failed to facilitate substantive increases. EU-level initiatives such as the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) do not deliver sufficiently on social investment projects, and the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) restricts, in many instances, Member States’ means of engaging in social investment themselves because necessary investment in human capital and essential services including housing, social, health, and education can quickly result in a breach of the SGP’s deficit rules. Accordingly, the so-called investment clause in the SGP has had limited use so far.

Heather Roy, Secretary General, Eurodiaconia stated: “The European Commission should encourage more social investments by a more systematic application of the investment clause 2.2 of the Stability and Growth Pact in relation to social investment. The Rome Declaration commits Members States and the European Institutions to upward social convergence. This cannot be realised if economic policies restrict social investment and where economic governance overlooks the long term social and economic returns of social investment. Otherwise leaders’ commitments in Rome stay in Rome and do not reach the people of the European Union.”

Klaus Heeger, Secretary General, CESI added that a “‘Silver Rule’ for public social investment could be introduced to European Economic Governance in order to effectively incentivise Member States to upscale social investment. The rule would allow for specific areas of social investment, which yield demonstrable economic and social returns, to be excluded from the SGP’s current deficit provisions. Public spending in fields such as health care, childcare, housing and education must be seen as an investment in both social and economic convergence and not merely treated as a burden or cost in national budgets.

Jana Hainsworth, President, Social Platform, commented: “The European Commission is increasingly supportive of social investment, stating that it is ‘a prerequisite for a successful and lasting recovery’. At a time of intensive scrutiny of the European project, it’s important that EU Member States follow the advice of the IMF and OECD, both of which have called for an end to austerity, favouring instead investment to promote growth and reduce inequalities.”

Press release as PDF

Press enquiries

Hendrik Meerkamp
Policy Adviser
CESI
+32 (0) 2 282 1870
[email protected]

Helen Joseph
Communications & Media Officer, Social Platform
+32 (0) 489 77 26 94
[email protected]

Stephan Burger
Policy and Membership Development Officer,
Eurodiaconia
+32 (0) 2 234 3860
[email protected]

European integration stands, again, at a crossroads. All actors must make a particular effort to make sure that the EU does not disintegrate. CESI has been voicing strong calls for a more social Europe for over 25 years.

Likely, time is now or never again for a constructive discussion on the future of European integration, based on the recent White Paper on the future of the EU, the European Commission’s contribution to the Rome Summit of March 25 2017, where the EU will discuss its future orientation.

Without explicitly opting for one of the 5 scenarios laid out in the White Paper[1], scenario 2 (the de-regulation agenda) may trigger a race to the bottom for social rights and employment conditions. Moreover, scenario 4 (the neo-liberal programme), may do away with an EU social agenda altogether, despite the fact that growing interconnections of economic, financial and social affairs require a certain cooperation and integration. Recent popular disappointment with the EU and stagnation in social and employment policies may justify scepticism that scenario 1 (carrying on) can be a long-term solution.

Bearing this is mind, EU leaders, heads of state and government and national politicians in the Member States should close ranks with trade unions all over Europe in their call to put the development of a real social dimension at the heart of a successful future EU: Social and economic fairness and equality has become the most important concern of the EU’s citizens. They will only accept a European integration project which responds to their needs.

Being aware that democratic legitimacy and mandating mainly occurs through traditional democratic channels at national levels, it is also time for all political actors to be ready to put Europe first – not as a goal in itself but in the very interest of the citizens.

Core components of a better social EU for European workers

• The EU shall become a stronghold against job precariousness and negative impacts of digitalisation. Making use of its legislative competences, the EU shall define ambitious labour rights and standards for new, flexible and mobile forms of employment as well as for the digitalising world of work.
• A more transparent and easy-to-use coordination of social security systems shall ensure that mobile workers do not lose out on social and employment-related benefits which they have accumulated during their work life.
• European labour law shall guarantee adequate protection levels for all workers, especially in occupational health and safety and when it comes to new and emerging psychosocial risks at work.
• The EU shall help guaranteeing minimum wages at national level, defined according to a minimum percentage of national median wages.
• The EU shall credibly explain why there will be no lower social, labour, consumer and environmental protection standards via new free trade and investment agreements.
• EU policies shall prioritise work-life balance, based on an equal sharing of domestic responsibilities and high-quality, affordable and accessible care facilities and responding to ageing societies and work-related gender inequalities.
• The EU shall adjust its economic policy mindset and allows significantly more national investments especially in education and training, health and youth employment, all vital human capital investments that make societies more just and prosperous in the long-term. Likewise, the EU shall encourage Member States to step up investments to make public administrations and public services more accessible, better and affordable, which benefit vulnerable persons, especially women, the young, elderly and migrants. This shall also be financed by means of a serious and successful common fight against tax avoidance and evasion.
• The right to information and consultation shall apply for all workers, including central administration employees. Effective social dialogue in all sectors shall help driving towards a fair and social Europe. All workers must count, and trade union pluralism must be a living principle of freedom and democracy.
• The full implementation and enforcement of social and employment legislation must be a reality. Trade unions’ efforts to facilitate shall be fully support by authorities and institutions at all levels.

[1] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/white_paper_on_the_future_of_europe_en.pdf

CESI Presidium resolution on the future of the EU (PDF)

“Today, we think of the victims and their families – and we think of their lives which have brutally changed, if not ended”, CESI President Romain Wolff stated. “A year ago, innocent civilians were hit as random targets. And in the end we can only pay tribute to them by fiercely defending our fundamental and democratic values of our free society and by standing firmly and united against terrorism and radicalization!”

As a European trade union confederation representing public sector workers across Europe, CESI has for a long time worked on sustainable, holistic approaches solutions to address radicalist threats. CESI’s affiliates, among them teachers, police officers, prison guards and administration officials, were among the first to face new radicalist tendencies within society, and to bring this to the attention of politicians and the public.

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger declared: “Anti-radicalisation cannot be reached by reinforced security measures alone. Multi-disciplinary and complementary, soft and hard, preventative and repressive policies are needed to integrate social, educational and security-related components, which can together yield an effective anti-radicalisation recipe.”

Heeger also underlined that the fight against terrorism requires a stronger policy coordination at the European level, as well as more support for all public sector workers in this field.

“Today it is the victims that we commemorate, and this should inspire our continued efforts in anti-radicalisation and counter-terrorism”, CESI President Romain Wolff concluded.

For further information about CESI’s work in this field, see a detailed position paper here.

Picture: © EurActiv 2017

Opening the conference were Mr Hans-George Engelke, the Secretray of State at the Ministry of Interior and Mr Hans-Ulrich Benra vice-president of the dbb. A clear message was sent out take on the challenges of psychosocial risks by emphasising the rise of stress levels due to a number of factors and the increase in external violence against central administration employees, both in Germany and in other member states.

Mr Lionel Fulton, the project researcher from the Labour Research Department in the UK, attend the conference to present the guide on psychosocial risks, which he has authored, that will serve as the first European guide especially produced for all the stakeholders within central government.

The guide provides brief reminder of European legislation, overview of the social dialogue agreements that have been concluded on stress and third party violence as well as examples of real collective agreements or individual case studies that have already been implemented in different member states.

The seminar also held three theme-based workshops that focused on better risk assessment and deployment of responsibilities; better use of new technologies, and; better prevent and act against external violence at the work place. On the agenda were also conclusions and potential follow-up actions to the project. The conference was then closed by Mr Christian Moos of the dbb Europe-International Secretary and Mr Christian Maiwald of BMI Germany.

The conclusions of the Berlin conference go hand in hand with the conclusions made at Europe Academy’s Madrid symposium in October 2016 within the “Health and safety at work in the public sector: new challenges” project. In Madrid it quickly became clear that restructuring hit the public sector quite significantly and that public employees suffered higher levels of stress due to it and digitalisation significantly the work organisation. The common conclusions could not be any clearer.

The guide will be translated into 7 languages and will be accompanied by a short video. The project material will be adopted at the Social Dialogue Committee for Central Government Administrations plenary on 15 May in Brussels.

Picture: Hans Ulrich Benra © dbb 2017

The Presidium decided that the following Trade Councils and Commissions, made up of representatives from interested member organisations, will be CESI’s internal sectoral fora for policy deliberations and exchange of views during the next four years:

• Commission ‘Employment and Social Affairs’ (SOC)
• Commission ‘Women’s Rights and Gender Equality’ (FEMM)
• Trade Council ‘Central Administration and Finances’ (ACF)
• Trade Council ‘Local and Regional Administration’ (LRA)
• Trade Council ‘Security’ (SEC)
• Trade Council ‘Justice’ (JUS)
• Trade Council ‘Education, Training and Research’ (EDUC)
• Trade Council ‘Health Services’ (SAN)
• Trade Council ‘Post and Telecoms’ (P&T)
• Trade Council ‘Defence’ (DEF)

Internal sectoral Trade Councils and Commissions set up

The Commissions and Trade Councils, which usually meet one to two times per year, will elect their respective President and up to two Vice-Presidents during their constitutive meetings in the course of this year. Meeting dates will be published in CESI’s calendar.

The Presidium also addressed CESI’s take on important current political affairs.

Positioning on current political affairs, including the White Paper on the future of the EU

With regards to the recent White Paper on the future of the EU by the European Commission, the Presidium instructed the General Secretariat to draft a position statement on CESI’s expectations towards the further construction of a social dimension in the EU as a formal input in view of the Rome Summit on March 25 which is expected to see the adoption of a declaration on the future of the EU by the heads of state or government of the Member States.

The Presidium also held exchanges of views as regards the expected package on a European Pillar of Social Rights, the ongoing social and labour market integration of refugees, and the prospects for higher levels of public social investments in Europe to strengthen public administrations and the public services, all among CESI’s long-standing priorities.

The next meeting of the Presidium will take place on June 21 in Brussels.

Picture: CESI Presidium in session © CESI 2017

This CESI@noon/EPC policy dialogue was the final event presenting the findings of a cycle of three previous joint expert workshops of an EPC-CESI cooperation on social investments:

• A workshop on measuring the efficiency of social investments in October 2015
• A seminar in February 2016 on the integration of a concept of social investment in the macro-economic and fiscal governance instruments of the EU

• An expert meeting on indicators for a better integration of the social investment concept and a move towards upwards social convergence in June 2016

Reflections on ‘Social investment: Time for a new narrative for Europe’ were given by Allan Larsson (Special Adviser on the European Pillar of Social Rights, European Commission), Lukas Vesely (Economic adviser to MEP Maria João Rodrigues), Conny Reuter (Secretary General, Solidar) and Gunnar Muent (Director for Innovation and Competitiveness, European Investment Bank). The session was chaired by Lieve Fransen, Senior Adviser at the European Policy Centre and former Director for Social Policy at the European Commission. There was a shared agreement on the continued need of additional public social investments alongside measures to make existing social expenditure more effective and forward-looking.

EPC in-depth study on ways towards more social investments in Europe

A study by the EPC summing up, evaluating and assessing the findings of the workshops was presented by Claire Dhéret, Senior Policy Analyst in charge of social investment at the EPC. The study also follows up on a recently launched advocacy campaign by CESI, Social Platform and Eurodiaconia on the feasibility of additional budgetary flexibility for certain public social investments by Member States without violating the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP).

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger, who also delivered the opening address at the CESI@noon/EPC policy dialogue, said: “Our advocacy campaign is a practical result of our cooperation with the EPC, with the aim to bring discussions from a technical and mostly academic to a political level with clear, broken-down messages. Our cooperation with the EPC is also an outcome of member organisations approaching us and reporting about continued cuts in public services and public administrations, which compromises on their capacity to deliver sufficient and high-quality services to the citizens.”

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger: Enable additional public social investments under the SGP

The CESI@noon/EPC policy dialogue formally closed the cooperation project between the EPC and CESI on social investment; nevertheless CESI and the EPC will continue to drive together the case for more public social investment in Europe. Klaus Heeger added: “Together with our partners we have already had several discussion sessions with experts and decision-makers, including with MEP Maria João Rodrigues and the cabinets of the Commissioners Dombrovskis and Thyssen. We are encouraged to see that the topic is gaining momentum on the political agenda. We hope the European Commission will soon work on a methodology to identify public social expenditure as investments with returns that should be exempted from the SGP’s budgetary deficit calculations.”

For further information: Hendrik Meerkamp, Policy adviser CESI, [email protected].

Picture: Claire Dhéret, Lieve Fransen and Klaus Heeger © European Policy Centre (EPC) 2017

On the 12^th of February 2017 the third reform of business taxation (RIE III) aimed at a tax relief of about 50% for companies was opposed by referendum by trade unions under the leadership of the organisation ZV Öffentliches Personal (Employees of the Public Sector Of Switzerland), a member of the CESI.

60% of eligible voters voted in favour of the referendum and thus against the third company tax reform (RIE III), which would have resulted in tax losses of CHF 4 billion in Switzerland and, consequently, enormous cuts in the public service and tax increases for the population.

CESI would like to highlight this result is a great success for our member union ZV Öffentliches Personal. It is a clear sign for the Swiss political circles that the electorate does not accept any reductions of the Public Service and that its financing must be guaranteed!

“On March 25, EU leaders will gather in Rome to commemorate the 60^th anniversary of the Rome Treaties. On this occasion they are expected to adopt a declaration on how they see the future of the EU and the European integration project as a whole. This is a much-needed opportunity to finally commit to a Europe which puts an end to gender-based discrimination. Last year, during extensive consultations on how to build such a Europe, CESI and its Commission on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality positioned themselves clearly vis-à-vis the European institutions and decision-makers.

We expect the European Commission to publish as soon as possible an ambitious European Pillar of Social Rights, which should incorporate an equally ambitious gender equality dimension. Above all, it should put into practice last year’s roadmap of the European Commission on work-life balance.

Encouraging a further equal sharing of domestic responsibilities between men and women and giving new opportunities for single parents to reconcile employment and running a household must be an absolute priority for policy makers. This ranges, for instance, from enhanced maternity leave rules, a better take-up of parental leave by fathers and the introduction of new carers’ leave schemes to more affordable and accessible child and elderly care services, a more equal access for women to managerial positions, less discriminatory promotion practices and further steps to reduce gender pay and pensions gaps.

National and EU leaders have a full agenda to deliver and I count on the Rome summit to deliver a strong pledge.”

Picture: Kirsten Lühmann © dbb 2017

The study assesses the EU’s legislative and policy framework on occupational health and safety, reviews fundamental work-related stress and psychosocial risks, analyses new working patters which contribute to these, and describes good practices on how to tackle new and emerging risks for safety and health at work in four public administrations in Europe:

• Spain: ‘Procedure n. 601’ for the determination of a risk assessment methodology, a check-list model for the early recognition of stressors in single work units, covering 250,000 public employees

• Belgium: A decision-tree of the Federal Public Service (FPS) in the container fumigation procedure for first line verification officers to perform an administratively correct and safe physical checks of containers for toxic gases and vapours

• Germany: A new Mental Stress Checklist of the Federal Agency for Family and Civil Society Tasks (BAFzA) to assess mental stress at the workplace

• Italy: A national-level survey by the Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL) to investigate the employer’s perception of working conditions, occupational risk exposure and their impact on health for workers

The full study can be accessed here. English, German, French, Spanish and Italian language versions are available.

The study was co-funded by the European Commission under budget heading 04 03 01 05 “Information and training measures for workers’ organisations”, Call VP/2016/002, and produced on behalf of CESI by Lorenzo Maria Pelusi and Michele Tiraboschi, ADAPT, Italy.

Picture: © CESI 2017

The European Sunday Alliance is a large network of national and European-level trade unions, civil society organizations and religious communities committed to raise awareness of the unique value of decent working hours in European societies. It joins forces with committed MEPs and offers a platform for exchange and discussion.

In particular, the Alliance:
• supports the protection of health and safety of workers and their right to a limit on maximum working hours and of a weekly rest period, including, in principle Sunday;

• advocates the respect for collective agreements covering work organisation, which are essential to the social contract of a modern European society;
• speaks up against the growing economic pressure undermining national regulations regarding working conditions
• fosters commitment to safeguard and promote work-free Sunday and decent working hours;
• pushes the EU institutions to safeguard Sunday, in principle, as the common weekly rest day in the EU;
• works to ensure that EU legislation and internal market rules guarantee the central place of health and safety, work- and life-balance and social cohesion by launching relevant initiatives to ensure work-free Sundays and decent working hours; and
• pushes governments of Member States to take their responsibility for improving, implementing and enforcing existing legislation and practices and respecting collective agreements.

More information can be accessed on the website of the European Sunday Alliance and in its Founding Statement.

Klaus Heeger: “Decent working hours a key challenge for workers today”

CESI joined the Alliance as a supporting member and encourages its member organisations to accede to the Alliance as full members.

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger said: “As highlighted in a main motion adopted at CESI’s last Congress, the EU Working Time Directive should apply as broadly as possible. CESI has for long recognised that decent working hours and adequate work-life balance are a key challenge for workers already today. Digitalisation and home-based work models are spreading along with emerging and unregulated so-called new forms of employment.”

He added: “It is vital that trade unions, social NGOs and churches join in a forceful coalition with decision-makers and politicians to make sure that employment remains regulated and fair for all. I am convinced that the European Sunday Alliance is a network that can make a difference.”

Logo: CESI / European Sunday Alliance Logo © CESI 2017 / © European Sunday Alliance 2017

The White Paper was presented as the European Commission’s contribution to the Rome Summit on March 25, when EU leaders will discuss about the future direction of the EU on the occasion of the 60^th anniversary of the Treaties of Rome. It presents five scenarios on how the EU could evolve by 2015, “depending on how it chooses to respond”:

• Scenario 1: Carrying On. The EU27 focuses on delivering its positive reform agenda in the spirit of the Commission’s New Start for Europe from 2014 and of the Bratislava Declaration agreed by all 27 Member States in 2016

• Scenario 2: Nothing but the Single Market. The EU27 is gradually re-centred on the single market as the 27 Member States are not able to find common ground on an increasing number of policy areas.
• Scenario 3: Those Who Want More Do More. The EU27 proceeds as today but allows willing Member States to do more together in specific areas such as defence, internal security or social matters.
• Scenario 4: Doing Less More Efficiently. The EU27 focuses on delivering more and faster in selected policy areas, while doing less where it is perceived not to have an added value. Attention and limited resources are focused on selected policy areas.
• Scenario 5: Doing Much More Together. Member States decide to share more power, resources and decision-making across the board. Decisions are agreed faster at European level and rapidly enforced.

The European Commission has announced an accompanying special reflection paper on the development of the EU’s social dimension for the next months. CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger said: “The White Paper and the forthcoming reflection paper on the EU’s social dimension certainly come at a crucial moment, as we await an ambitious European Pillar of Social Rights.”

He added: “Leaders in the EU institutions and the Member States must now reflect on what future they see for the EU, and then act with a clear vision. For Europe’s workers, it is critical that the EU will not be stripped of achievements in employment and social affairs. As stated in one of the main motions adopted at CESI’s last Congress, the growing interconnections of national economic, financial and social policies require a strong signal towards greater integration. Thanks to the EU, workers across Europe enjoy rights and working conditions they would not if it wasn’t for the EU.”

The full text of the White Paper can be accessed on the European Commission’s webpage.

Picutre: Logo ‘Future of Europe’ © European Commission 2017

Generally, CESI welcomes the conclusion of comprehensive trade agreements as a tool to promote growth and wealth, but only if they do not undermine European minimum standards in terms of labour and core social rights, and only if they protect public services in the spirit of the (TTIP-related) EU-US joint statement on public services of March 2015.

Secretary General Klaus Heeger said: “It is now more likely than ever before that there will be a fully-fledged CETA soon. This is a fact we should all acknowledge. In the future, together with our member organisation, it will be key for us to keep a close eye on impacts of CETA on labour and social rights.

All social partners should be involved in an ongoing, formalised monitoring process.”

Klaus Heeger added: “A CETA monitoring process should also include consequences of the agreement on public services. CESI has highlighted for long that public services should enjoy special protection under free trade and investment agreements, as the European Parliament also requested in its previous own-initiative report on TTIP.”

For CESI, it also remains of fundamental importance that the proposed investment court system (ICS) (that ‘would replace the investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism and which is not yet subject to provisional application) will neither undermine democratic principles and the provision of public services, nor lead to a lowering of consumer, environment and workers´ protection standards.

“This will have to be closely monitored by CESI and its member organisations in the coming months”, the CESI Secretary General concluded.

More information about CESI’s position on CETA and free trade and investment agreements more generally can be accessed in a position paper on CESI’s website.

Picture: Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, in the European Parliament in Brussels © European Union 2016/EC Audiovisual Service/Melanie Wenger

The discussion touched upon many points relevant to the fight against radicalisation, but also to the social policies needed to prevent social exclusion in Europe. The general sentiment is that the EU is at a turning point, facing unprecedented challenges with regards to radicalisation, terrorism and the rise of populism.

Furthermore, social media have become tools to prevent but also to spread radical and populist propaganda. The digital revolution is challenging the requirements of the workforce of the future.

“In these times, we are more than ever faced with intellectual and moral uncertainty and it is of utmost importance for us to be able to defend those value we consider being fundamental: human dignity, freedom and tolerance”, Secretary General Klaus Heeger underlined. “CESI focuses on the importance and the valorisation of teachers, and the transmission of these values through education.”

The discussion with Commissioner Navracsics also included the importance of investment in education. “Today´s high unemployment especially amongst the young is also rooted in yesterday’s education policies and the lack in investments thereof”, Commissioner Navracsics highlighted. “The electorate demands tangible results now, but investments in education will show on a long-term basis.”

CESI will continue highlighting the many challenges facing the educational sector as much as we tackle the security situation, making sure that no one is excluded or left behind.

Picture: CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger with Commissioner Tibor Navracsics © European Union, 2017/EC Audiovisual Service/ Francois Walschaerts

n line with the motions adopted by the last CESI Congress in December 2016, the overarching topics to guide the work of the General Secretariat will be:

• The future of Europe – Investing in people;
• Public services – Delivering results; and
• Digitalisation – Finding the balance.

Action points of the individual Trade Councils and Commissions, CESI’s specialised internal forums of debate for member organisations, include:

• Employment and Social Affairs (SOC) Commission
Implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights (esp. regarding access to social protection, the implementation and application of the EU working time directive, and the role of public social investment for economic growth nd social cohesion)
Working for higher youth employment rates (esp. in the context of necessary skills and a facilitated voluntary mobility of apprentices) – jointly with the Education Trade Council

• Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM) Commission
Reducing gender pay and pensions gaps
Combating violence against women, including moral abuse (esp. at work)
Working towards better work-life balance for employees, especially in the field of caring responsibilities

• Central Administration and Finances (ACF) Trade Council
Highlighting the dangers of austerity politics for the functioning of public services
Reducing in-work poverty
Digitalisation (esp. its contribution to quality public services)
Progressing on social dialogue (esp. concerning a follow-up to the agreement on the rights to information and consultation of workers of central administrations signed on 21 December 2015)
Raising awareness about the role of tax administrations in fighting tax fraud and tax evasion
Implementing worker-friendly telework schemes
Working towards fair advancement and promotion schemes in the civil service
Achieving an effective protection of public services in free trade and investment agreements
Highlighting the role of public services in the intetration of migrants of refugees
Combating violence against public service employees

• Local and Regional Administration (LRA) Trade Council
Integrating migrants (esp. with regards costs and consequences for administrations and challenges faced by employees)
Impacts of digitalisation on local and regional administrations
Equipping local and regional administration workers in terms of impacts of digitalisation on working conditions and employment relationships
Implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights for staff in local and regional administrations
Addressing the phenomenon of freeman (i.e. criminal law responses to people refusing to recognise the state monopoly and structure while benefitting from it)

• Health (SAN) Trade Council
Following-up on the EU Green Paper on Health
Dealing with shortages of human resources in the health sector
Implications of Brexit on health personnel
Collaborating for the benefit of mobile workers in the health care sector
Achieving a sustainable recruitment of carers

• Education, Training, Research (EDUC) Trade Council
Addressing migration-related challenges for public schools
Achieving better professional training and dual education systems
Improving the image of teachers
Achieving more moral and material support for the education system and education staff
Working for higher youth employment rates (esp. in the context of necessary skills and a facilitated voluntary mobility of apprentices) – jointly with the Employment and Social Affairs (SOC) Commission

• Post and Telecoms (P&T) Trade Council
Working towards an operational ‘Committee to assess economic regulation in the telecommunications sector’ (CEREST)
Addressing impacts of digitalisation in the post and telecom sectors
Achieving better flexible working time organisation schemes for workers in the post and telecoms sectors
Creating more age-appropriate working places
Fighting social dumping in the post and telecoms sectors
Raising awareness about problems related to liberalisations in the post and telecoms sectors

• Security (SEC) Trade Council
Improving counter-terrorism systems and external border controls/related data exchanges
Raising awareness about the role and work of employees in the security sector
Coming forward with a proposal on a fund to security sector employees going through a trauma

• Justice Trade Council
Addressing challenges linked to privatisations in the justice sector and especially of prisons
Highlighting the right of association and industrial action for justice sector employees
Working towards a better training and equipment and a better prevention of violence against employees in the justice sector
Assessing the impacts of the migration on the penitentiary system
Preventing violence against justice employees and achieving better work-life balance for them
Addressing challenges linked to data exchange and data surveillance

• Defence (DEF) Trade Council
Pooling and legitimising security measures in Europe (esp. in the context of the European defence union and the EU Defence action plan)
Raising awareness about implications of cuts in the defence budgets
Improving working conditions and rights of civil and military employees of the defence sector

More information about the individual Trade Councils and Commissions can be accessed here. The meeting dates of the individual trade councils and commissions for the year 2017 will be set shortly.

The document can be accessed in the policy positions section of CESI’s website in English, German, French, Spanish and Italian language.

It pins down CESI’s interests with regards to all EU free trade and investment agreements, ranging from TTIP to TiSA and CETA, and stipulates the following:
• The EU must make sure that trade agreements will in no way negatively affect, erode or even dismantle social and labour standards and rights established by international, EU and EU Member States’ legal orders;
• Services of general interest (SGIs) must be fully exempted from trade agreements;
• National rules and award criteria in public procurement mechanisms should be excluded from trade agreements as their definition must remain unchanged in relation to the currently existing EU public procurement rules;
• Special investor protection instruments for cases of investor-state disputes should not run against the governments’ right to meet core public policy objectives; and
• Secrecy in trade negotiations must end.

Contact [email protected] for further information about the position paper.

The next CESI Congress, upcoming on December 2, will be under the following three themes:
• Digitalisation: Finding the balance
• Public services: Delivering results
• The future of Europe: Investing in people

The Europe Academy, CESI’s internal training centre, will conduct a year-long project on occupational health and safety. Landmark events will be seminars on ‘New working rhythms and their impact on health’ in Copenhagen on June 3 and on ‘Responsible players in the implementation of the occupational safety and health policy in the public sector in Europe: managers, trade unions, safety reps’ in Madrid on October 14.

The Trade Councils and Commissions, the specialised internal forums of debate for CESI’s member organisations, adopted the following action programmes:

• Employment and Social Affairs (SOC) Commission
Quality employment: Fight against precariousness on the labour market
Adaptation to change: Preparation of employees to technological (and other) changes
Full employment: Youth unemployment and work-life balance

• Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM) Commission
Situation of women refugees
Strategy for gender equality
Equal treatment
Domestic violence

• Central Administration and Finances (ACF) Trade Council
Social dialogue: Follow-up of the agreement on the rights to information and consultation of workers of central administrations signed on 21 December 2015
Digitalisation: Risks for the financing capacity of the social protection systems
Fight against tax fraud and tax evasion
The central importance (revalorisation) of central administrations in Europe
Dangers of austerity politics

• Local and Regional Administration (LRA) Trade Council
Integration of refugees: Costs and consequences for the administrations, challenges for employees
Digitalisation: Processes and consequences for workplaces
Extension of the working life: Challenges and opportunities for workers above age 50

• Security (SEC) Trade Council
30 years of Schengen: Members States and accession states, refugees and migration issues, illegal trafficking, Schengen Information System (SIS), external borders control
Terrorism and new forms of criminality linked to refugee and migration issues
Labour protection in the police sector

• Education, Training, Research (EDUC) Trade Council
The challenges linked to the migration crisis
Teaching values in the fight against radicalisation
The inclusion of disabled students

• Health (SAN) Trade Council
Impacts of digitalisation: Bureaucracy?
Access to and quality of health services for migrant and ethnic minorities
Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (EXPH)
Working time directive: Follow-up of recent EU Court of Justice jurisdiction
Position of less educated workers

• Justice Trade Council
Impacts of the refugees crisis on the penitentiary system
Violence against justice employees
Right to strike of justice public employees and the establishment of an effective industrial relations dispute resolution machinery
Privatisations in the justice sector
Training and revised security arrangements for employees in the justice sector to properly deal with new challenges such as radicalisation

• Post and Telecoms (P&T) Trade Council
Digital Agenda
CEREST
Flexible work-planification
Extension of the Trade council to other member organisations

• Defence (DEF) Trade Council
Deployment of armed forces to solve the refugee crisis
Cuts in the defence budgets: Impacts on the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)
Political chances of intensified military cooperation efforts
Sovereignty options for European defence
Labour rights of civil and military employees of the defence sector
Gender equality in military forces

More information about the individual Trade Councils and Commissions can be accessed here. For the full calendar of CESI events, please consult the website’s calendar section.

The interpretative communication is expected in March, as a measure to complement the forthcoming European Pillar of Social Rights.

According the European Commission, the aim of the interpretative communication is to bring legal clarity and certainty to the Member States and social partners when applying the working time directive, including clarifying the scope for flexibility and derogations in its application, and to assist Member States in implementing the directive in a way that minimises burdens and avoids infringements. To that end, the document is expected to compile the provisions arising from both the text of the directive and its interpretation through relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in a single document in order to make them clearer, more readable and accessible to all.

CESI is not satisfied with the current working time rules as set by the Working Time Directive but fears that a legislative revision might bring even lower levels of protection for workers against overtime and excessive working hours. CESI still welcomes the forthcoming interpretative communication.

In its recent position paper on the European Pillar of Social Rights, one of CESI’s main priorities was the proper implementation and application of existing EU rules.

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger said: “CESI is closely following this dossier, which is a priority for many of our member organisations. Many workers across Europe continue to be affected by ill-applied flexibility and derogation clauses of the Working Time Directive. During the last years, more than 50 judgments of the Court of Justice have interpreted the provisions of the directive. This has made it hard to keep an overview in terms of the applicable personal scope, definition of working time or on-call time, the timing of compensatory rest or paid annual leave. I hope the forthcoming communication will make it easier for trade unions and authorities to address improper applications of the Directive.”

Picture: CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger © CESI 2017

The meeting launched a joint initiative by CESI, Social Platform and Eurodiaconia to nourish and structure emerging debates about a feasible and effective roadmap towards more public investments to counter social divergences in Europe.

Klaus Heeger, Secretary General of CESI, said: “Against the backdrop of sluggish public social investments and resulting increased social divergences across Europe, calls to allow Member States more budgetary flexibility under the EU’s macroeconomic governance framework are becoming increasing vocal. So far, however, a clear and politically feasible plan for this is missing.”

Jana Hainsworth, President of Social Platform, noted: “The need to promote investment is very high on the European agenda, but it mainly focuses on infrastructure, energy and transport. So far there has been little scope for the promotion of social investment. The cost of non-investment in people will be significant in the long-term not only from the social perspective, but in economic terms too.”

Opinions were given by Andriana Sukova-Toshevas, Director for investment at the European Commission as well as by the MEP Maria João Rodrigues (S&D, PT) and the CEO of the European Policy Centre (EPC), Fabian Zuleeg.

Andriana Sukova-Toshevas, Director for investment at the European Commission, stated that the Commission will continue making use of budgetary flexibility to promote investment in Member States with limited fiscal space. She added that there is scope for better targeting of social investment in the frame of the European Semester and the European Structural and Investment Funds.

Maria João Rodrigues, Member of the European Parliament, emphasised that it is possible to promote fiscal discipline and investment at the same time. The country-specific recommendations of the European Semester should be used to better translate this policy mix, she said.

Fabian Zuleeg, CEO of the European Policy Centre, argued that social investment needs to be clearly defined. It is also important to show that social investment can also be a productive factor, he stressed.

Heather Roy, Secretary General of Eurodiaconia, said: “Following our launching discussion today, our objective is to continue driving and helping structure the debate on more public social investments in Europe, a topic of clearly vital importance for Europe’s societies. What we need is politically feasible approaches and solutions.”

Picture: © CESI 2017

Romain Wolff and Klaus Heeger were re-elected President and Secretary General respectively. Urs Stauffer will succeed Frank Stöhr as Treasurer.

All three were elected with large majorities.

Romain Wolff, Klaus Heeger and Urs Stauffer to lead CESI

Romain Wolff will enter his second term of office, having been President of CESI since 2012. As a long-standing trade unionist, he has been Secretary General of CESI’s Luxembourgish member organisation CGFP (General Confederation of Public Services) since 2005. In his speech, Romain Wolff underlined the long way that CESI has come as a constructive interest group and recognised social partner at the EU level, and stressed his determination to help shape CESI’s further evolution during the next years.

Klaus Heeger, German, has been Secretary General of CESI since 2012. His noted expertise in EU affairs and experience in lobbying and social dialogue are to root CESI’s interest representation further in the Brussels arena. During his address to the Congress, Mr Heeger underscored the importance of CESI as an actor in Brussels, stressing the need of a strong voice of workers at the EU level in the management of the post-crisis employment and social affairs policies.

Urs Stauffer has been President of the Swiss trade union ZV (Central Association of Public Personnel) since 2002. He has held several positions within CESI in the past; during the last legislative period he was a Vice-President of CESI. Addressing the Congress, Urs Stauffer pledged to continue to manage CESI’s finances in a successful and sustainable manner.

The CESI Presidium will be completed by:

• Péterné Erzsébet Boros (MKKSZ, Hungary)
• Klaus Dauderstädt (dbb, Germany)
• Jean-Claude Delage (FP CFE-CGC, France)
• José Fernández Vidál (CSI-F, Spain)
• Patrick Fey (CNV Connectief, the Netherlands)
• Fritz Neugebauer (Eurofedop, European Federation)
• Marco Paolo Nigi (CONF.S.A.L., Italy)

Keynote address by European Commission Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis

The keynote address at the Congress was delivered by Valdis Dombrovskis, Vice-President of the European Commission, in charge of the Euro and Social Dialogue. In his speech, Mr Dombrovskis highlighted CESI’s important role in EU social dialogue and its constructive contribution to European policy debates as a voice of workers and public sector employees.

Motions adopted on the future of work, public services and digitalisation

Three overarching main motions, accompanied by side motions, were adopted, which provide guidelines for the strategic work, social dialogue activities and interest representation work of the CESI General Secretariat and mandate holders until the next Congress in 2020. They focus on what the workers which CESI represents consider priority fields for action during the next years:

The first adopted motion, with side motions, reviews the EU’s challenges more generally and specifically in the field of employment and social affairs, touching on issues such as occupational health and safety, gender equality at work, social dialogue, in-work poverty and labour law standards.

The second adopted motion and its accompanying side motions focus on the need to invest in public services and public administrations as a tool for adequate working conditions for public sector workers and, importantly, social cohesion through the provision of accessible and affordable services of general interests for citizens.

The third motion and its side motions, address the impacts of digitalisation on employment, worker rights and trade unionism in detail. It stipulates that digitalisation can be an opportunity for workers – if it is properly regulated.

In addition, a number of motions were adopted to change the statutes of CESI so as to improve the organisation’s functioning and governance structure. This includes the formal recognition of CESI’s youth representation, the CESI Youth.

For the adopted motions:

• Adopted main motion 1 – Investing in people
• Adopted motions accompanying main motion 1
• Adopted main motion 2 – Public services
• Adopted motions accompanying main motion 2
• Adopted main motion 3 – Digitalisation
• Adopted motions accompanying main motion 3
• Adopted motion to adjust CESI’s statutes
• Adopted urgency motion on democracy, rule of law, fundamental rights and freedoms

The position paper, which complements CESI’s formal contribution to the ongoing public consultation, focuses on five key action points that should, according to CESI, be an integral part of the Pillar:

• Gaps in fields in which the EU has legislative competences must be closed via binding standards based on the highest level of job quality and protection for workers and citizens. This relates especially to directives and regulations concerning: new, flexible forms of employment; consequences of mobile and digital work models on employment relationships and worker rights; and adequate work-life balance based on a notion of gender equality according to which responsibilities in households should be equally shared.

• It is crucial that EU law and rules in employment and social affairs are implemented and enforced more rigorously and without exception.

• In areas in which the EU has no clear legislative competences (large parts of social affairs), a step towards more social cohesion in Europe could be the development of a set of commonly accepted and meaningful indicators which can measure social change timely, effectively and to the most objective extent possible. Once established, such social indicators should be monitored regularly by means of analogous benchmarks in the Member States which measures relative improvements.

• Implementing the Pillar will require more public investments in Member States in areas such as early childhood care, health, education and training. Investment possibilities under the current EU’s macroeconomic and fiscal surveillance framework remain very restrictive; in this context more flexibility and incentives for increased public social investments should be enabled and encouraged by the EU – A new Golden rule for public social investments is needed.

• Developing and implementing the Pillar should involve all recognised social partners at all levels of the process. Inclusive sectoral and interprofessional social dialogues are fundamental, based on the criteria established in the European Commission’ SEC(2010) 9064 final (p.5) to be recognised as a sectoral social partner in European sectoral social dialogue.

The full position paper can be accessed here.

As defence has become increasingly urgent concern for the EU, the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs presented a respective report.

It is now clear that based on recent developments, a change of mind-set has to take place in Europe and its Member States.

Thomas Sohst, President of the CESI Defence Trade Council and member of the German Armed Forces Association has expressed his deep satisfaction: “It is the first time that a report on European defence mentions social aspects explicitly. This underlines, that it is not merely a question of providing combatants, material and weapons. It is also about the people, the soldiers, the citizens in uniform.”

EUROMIL, the European Organisation of Military Associations, had commented on the draft version of July, so that issues of particular concern for soldiers -such as the right of military personnel to form and join professional associations or trade unions and the involvement in a regular social dialogue with the authorities – have been included in the report.

“We now invite the European Council to take concrete steps towards the harmonisation and standardisation of the European armed forces, in order to facilitate the cooperation of armed forces personnel under the umbrella of a new European Defence Union. I am convinced that this first step will open up plenty more opportunities to improve the situation Europe wide”, Mr. Sohst added.

CESI’s Defence Trade Council will continue to follow the process and the various developments on both EU and national level following this decision.

Following some initial references to the need for more investments in last year’s AGS, this year’s edition features additional mentions in this field.

According to the Commission, Member States should invest more in labour market participation, quality jobs, training and upskilling and in social infrastructure and access to quality services, including childcare, healthcare, long-term care and education. ‘The low funding cost environment makes it an ideal time for the Member States to frontload public investments’, the Commission writes. It also made an important direct link between investments in human capital and economic growth, noting that investments in training ‘will be needed to push up growth of total factor productivity’.

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger said: “In this year’s AGS, the European Commission implies that investment in human capital is economically worthwhile. The Commission also recognises the urgency to deliver inclusive growth and fare better in the fight against poverty and social exclusion. In our view, this is vital for Europe’s economic and social recovery.”

At the same time, the AGS still needs a further paradigm shift towards enabling more public social investments. The Commission advocates more investments by those countries that can afford it, thus moving the euro area as a whole towards a positive fiscal stance, but warns all other Member States to do so. The Commission underscores that ‘where fiscal space does not exist [to invest, Member States] should deliver on the requirements given by the Stability and Growth Pact.’

“According to the Commission, cuts in public budgets still take precedence over public social investments. However, it is mostly those countries hit hardest by the crisis and with the highest debt levels which have the greatest social challenges but no scope to remedy because of the EU’s restrictive budgetary surveillance rules”, Klaus Heeger said.

The European Commission considers a more systematic application of existing flexibility rules under the Stability and Growth Pact (the so-called investment clause), which will allow Member States to make some investments even when stretching the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). This is encouraging but not sufficient.

“In sum, Member States continue to be threatened by EU sanctions in case of increased spending for social purposes and in human capital. What we need is a revision of the Stability and Growth Pact to allow Member States to invest more socially. Using creative arguments, the Commission and the Council recently let Spain and Portugal off the hook after they had violated the Pact, but if the rules were modified sensibly, there would be no more need to wind out of sanctions for reasonable spendings. Trade unions, civil society groups and politicians have increasingly been voicing support for this. Time is ripe for a Golden Rule for public social investments according to which certain expenditures in human capital and social cohesion can be exempted from the Pact. Also public administrations and public services need to be well-funded and equipped if they are to provide accessible and high quality support for citizens”, Klaus Heeger underlined.

On a more general note, he added: “CESI welcomes references in the AGS to the importance of social dialogue in the labour markets. However, there is no mentioning of the need for more inclusive and pluralist social dialogue. In our view, there are worrying trends across Europe of the largest trade unions finding themselves in increasingly privileged positions. In our view, all workers count and it should not exclusively be the biggest social partners that are heard by policy-makers and institutions.”

According to the report, the recent coup “represented a direct attack on democracy in Turkey”, but there has been a “serious backsliding in the past year in the area of freedom of expression”, with “selective and arbitrary application of the law.” Overall, the report notes, post-coup decrees issued by the Erdogan government “produce effects beyond the state of emergency” which “raises questions as to the proportionality of the measures taken.” Most importantly, the report finds that measures also affect key rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), in particular the right to a fair trial.

Klaus Heeger, CESI Secretary General expressed his deep worries about the current situation in Turkey: “CESI and its member organisations avow themselves to the principles of democracy and the rule of such laws designed to protect fundamental rights, especially those established by the European Convention on Human Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We are therefore strongly calling upon all relevant actors to do what is in their power to make sure that those persons who, as a consequence of the coup, may have been suspended, dismissed or even arrested, are unconditionally guaranteed the fundamental rights to a fair trial by independent and impartial tribunals and the presumption of ‘innocence until proven guilty’. Arbitrary persecutions and arrests remain incompatible with fundamental rights and the rule of law.”

The full Turkey Report can be accessed here.

Yes, the gap between the EU and the citizens must be closed to secure the future of the European project, but, let’s be honest, if the EU wants to provide solutions for the big issues, the renationalisation of policies cannot be the answer. The growing interconnections of national economic, financial, social and security policies require a strong signal towards greater integration within Europe and improved international cooperation.

Empowering the EU to “deliver results” in such areas as migration, security, defense, external relations and taxations require further shifts of national sovereignty in, admittedly, very sensitive areas.

As a trade unionist it is easy to say that solidarity is at the heart of the European social model, but this solidarity cannot only be invoked among workers and between workers and those excluded from the labour market – it must also be invoked between Member States in all kind of policy fields.

Yet as we know, we call for ‘more Europe’ when we think we can impose our way of thinking upon the continent. And we denounce this Europe as undemocratic and intrusive when someone else’s vision is to be imposed upon us.

What we have to learn again is to accept compromises – not only to see them as evils destined to undermine our democracies, but also as necessary steps when serving higher interests.

This higher interest is a more united European continent, a continent where the unconditional respect of democracy, the rule of law and the respect for fundamental rights and liberties are inalienable guiding principles.

After the US Presidential elections, it is fundamental that the EU stands for these values around the world more fiercely than ever before. That is, in the end, what will keep Europe strong.

Kirsten Lühmann, CESI´s FEMM Commission´s chairwoman (again) welcomed the EC initiative: “The European Commission is demonstrating great motivation concerning this issue and it can count on CESI’s unconditional support in its endeavours. However, let us also be honest, the current prognoses are clearly not encouraging. “

According to the latest Global Gender Gap Report 2016 of the world Economic Forum, the worldwide gender pay gap will not be closed for another 170 years, and the economic gender gap 2016 “has reverted back to where it stood in 2008, after a peak in 2013.”

Lühmann deeply deplores these findings: “The 2015 report had predicted 118 years for the worldwide gender gap to close, and now we are at 170 years! Even if economic slowdown has to be taken into account, it means that in too many countries homework has not been done.”

Referring to the to her mind most important conclusions of the Report, according to which the forecasts “reflect the current state of progress and serve as a call to action to policymakers and other stakeholders to accelerate gender equality “, Kirsten Lühmann highlighted everyone´s responsibility:

“CESI is such a stakeholder, and we reiterate our firm intention to make things change. We provide all our expertise relating to the modern working world for the EU equality strategy. As trade unions, we see cases of unequal treatment on a daily basis, so we know that problems are particularly serious for women in the professional world. “

Yet for CESI´s FEMM-Commission chairwoman one thing remains key for any real success: “If the main responsibility for home and child care remains on women, labour market equality will never work. There we need strong legislative incentives and obligations which may lead to a real change of paradigm in our heads.”

Kirsten Lühmann, CESI´s FEMM Commission´s chairwoman (again) welcomed the EC initiative: “The European Commission is demonstrating great motivation concerning this issue and it can count on CESI’s unconditional support in its endeavours. However, let us also be honest, the current prognoses are clearly not encouraging. “

According to the latest Global Gender Gap Report 2016 of the world Economic Forum, the worldwide gender pay gap will not be closed for another 170 years, and the economic gender gap 2016 “has reverted back to where it stood in 2008, after a peak in 2013.”

Lühmann deeply deplores these findings: “The 2015 report had predicted 118 years for the worldwide gender gap to close, and now we are at 170 years! Even if economic slowdown has to be taken into account, it means that in too many countries homework has not been done.”

Referring to the to her mind most important conclusions of the Report, according to which the forecasts “reflect the current state of progress and serve as a call to action to policymakers and other stakeholders to accelerate gender equality “, Kirsten Lühmann highlighted everyone´s responsibility:

“CESI is such a stakeholder, and we reiterate our firm intention to make things change. We provide all our expertise relating to the modern working world for the EU equality strategy. As trade unions, we see cases of unequal treatment on a daily basis, so we know that problems are particularly serious for women in the professional world. “

Yet for CESI´s FEMM-Commission chairwoman one thing remains key for any real success: “If the main responsibility for home and child care remains on women, labour market equality will never work. There we need strong legislative incentives and obligations which may lead to a real change of paradigm in our heads.”

Within the frame of this meeting and his speech at the Congress, Romain Wolff highlighted four points that represent, according to CESI, important barriers to a proper balance between work and family life: rigid working time, children’s care, family members’ care and an the difficult shift from full time to part-time work.

“While a general increased flexibility is welcomed and may be positively influenced by new technologies, this cannot happen at the expenses of the employees´ availability, working time and, last but not least, safety and health”, Romain Wolff underlined. “However, the most fundamental obstacle to be overcome is the one in our heads, telling us us that women should be the ones carrying most of the family and household loads. As long as we cannot achieve a shift of paradigm in this regard, the concepts of work-life balance and gender equality will remain empty slogans!”

In this context, CESI´s French members and colleagues from Alliance Police Nationale have met with the President of the French Republic Francois Hollande to further discuss urgent matters that complicate the work carried out around the clock by security officers.

“The exasperation is fully comprehensible, and CESI reiterates our support for amending and improving working conditions for the security forces. Our colleagues at Alliance Police Nationale have been battling the topic of legitimate defence and safe working conditions for French security officers for years and we not only support them at every step of the way but would like to see these issues being handled more seriously on the European level” Klaus Heeger said.

CESI encourages and supports the trade union movements, and reiterates that we need to protect the ones that are protecting us.

More than 130 participants came together in Madrid to discuss and recommend best practices for efficiently implementing and enforcing OSH policies and regulatory frameworks in the public sector, particularly highlighting the role of managers, trade unions and safety reps.

During the event it emerged that the public sector is very often the first sector to be hit by restructuring and that this usually means more work to be done by less personnel – while expectations addressed to the public sector and its workers are permanently increasing. This leads to problems related to health and safety at work, it was said.

Participants and speakers also underlined that new technologies lead to a “dematerialisation of the office life”, which translates into a change of working time patterns, work organisation and work rhythms. It was highlighted that these new working rhythms -but also the use of the new mobile work devices- can have a profound impact on health and safety.

Different high-level interventions noted the influence of work-life balance, work organisation and of course working conditions not only on the safety and health of workers but also on the productivity of the workforce. The costs of implementing efficient OSH policies within companies or administrations, which always lead to concrete economic and financial returns, need to be considered as investments, it was said. Participants also underscored the role of trade unions and social partners as constructive partners, not as obstacles, in the definition and implementation of OSH measures.

Many speakers underlined the further need to raise awareness about the importance of OSH policies, improve the exchange of best practices, expand and specify legislative frameworks and, most important of all, ensure their proper enforcement.

In his conclusions, Klaus Heeger, CESI Secretary General, highlighted the need for CESI and its member organisations to inform each other and work together hand in hand in order to make sure that the best OSH legislation, models and practices are adopted and applied throughout Europe.

The findings of the symposium, along with those of the first conference of the year, will be used to finalise a study on best practices in OSH in the public sector in Europe. The conference programme, speaker presentations and all further material related to the Madrid symposium and this year’s project of the Europe Academy will be published here.

Matthäus Fandrejewski’s intervention was a follow-up from the European Youth Event (EYE), which took place in May this year in Strasbourg, presenting ideas relating to the EU External Action in dealing with migratory flows.

According to Matthäus, there is an urgent need to better recognise and match skills of migrants with the needs on local labour markets in Europe. In particular, he said that following a screening with the help of a new CV-like database, migrants arriving in Europe should, where possible, be matched to Member States which are in need of special skills that they possess – of course, while taking their cultural backgrounds into consideration. Moreover, a harmonised international equivalence system and a more effective scheme for recognition of qualifications should be implemented in order to assess and make use of the professional competences of migrants that were educated and trained abroad. This would maximise chances for migrants to find employment, make a positive impact on the economy and domestic labour markets, and integrate into societies and local civil society structures.

Matching skills of migrants with needs on local labour markets

He said: “As a trade unionist I know how painstakingly difficult it is to find an opportunity on today’s labour market, even for national citizens. When it comes to migrants they face even bigger difficulties as they have to overcome language barriers and not knowing whether your skills are officially recognised will also lead to a lack of self-confidence. The proposal is to create a database where migrants can upload their CV in order to check if their skills match with the needs of the Member State they would like to emigrate to. Once a match has been found, the migrant can send their application to the Member State. Subsequently the Member State can then verify the application and information the migrant whether he/she stands a good chance to find employment according to their skills, qualifications and languages.”

Investments in public services needed

The implementation of his proposal, he said, would however require the political will of decision-makers to invest more in the necessary public services and administrations. A video recording of the debate that took place can be accessed through the European Parliament’s website. A statement by Matthäus is also available on the European Parliament’s Instagram page.

What is responsible: the discrete but decisive actions of the EU, or internal political pressure on the island itself? Whatever the reason, Prime Minister May has recently announced that Article 50 will be triggered at the end of March 2017 at the latest. The final, effective decision to do so can only be made by the Parliament in Westminster, however.

That is why it is still possible (though currently believed to be unlikely) that the British government may not be able to announce its intention of exiting the EU in accordance with Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, due to a majority vote in the British Parliament from MPs who never wanted the country to leave the EU, despite the British people’s vote in favour of Brexit. In addition, until then, developments in terms of its relations with the EU could lead to the new British government being unable to justify the country’s exit from the European Union. The EU would then find itself in an even more critical position than before the British referendum. Indeed, if the 27-member union does not want gamble away all its chances at a convincing new beginning with greater acceptance and support for European integration and put its own survival at risk, it will have to clearly define its relations and requirements for our British friends.

In order to prevent the failure of negotiations and under pressure from the British, the secession clause was integrated into the EU Basic Treaty or Reform Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU Treaty). The Treaty was thus signed on 13 December 2007 in Lisbon, the city after which the last and currently valid EU Treaty was named.

According to Article 50, an EU Member State “may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements”. To activate its withdrawal, the state “shall notify the European Council of its intention”. Once Article 50 has been triggered, the Member State and the Union must negotiate and conclude an agreement “setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal”. The treaties shall cease to apply to the state in question from the date of the entry into force of the withdrawal agreement. If a state which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin again, its request shall be subject to Article 49 TFEU. Those are the legal requirements.

As can be noted, Article 50 does not exclude the scenario described above. It does not set forth whether or when the British government must make its decision to withdraw from the Union following the British people’s vote. Moreover, the 2-year deadline can be extended, thus requiring further interpretation. In other words, the entire EU could be taken hostage by such manoeuvring by the British government.

However, that cannot be the rationale underlying this somewhat half-baked provision. At the time of its conception, Article 50 was a new, psychological concession directed at the British who were fearful for their sovereignty. However, it was not designed to become a lever and licence for them to weaken or compromise Europe’s unification achievements by means of an unlimited period of limbo because the British government must follow through the politically binding albeit de jure not binding popular Brexit vote. This would lead to a lengthy period of uncertainty, finally ending in the conclusion that the negotiation of a withdrawal agreement is too complicated and tiresome to reach, and that it would not be worth the effort anymore due to the fact that the EU has become too weak and incapable of action.

(A new referendum could provide a solution to the de facto non-negotiable withdrawal agreement – and those responsible would be spared. But in that case, the citizens of all European member states would be dupe, and this would be difficult to justify. Once again, the burden of the blame would fall upon the EU in its usual scapegoat role – instead of it being viewed as a beacon of hope.)

In any case, until then, only a handful of large and influential Member States would be in charge of deciding in what direction the EU should head. Article 218 TFEU sets forth the process for the negotiation of a withdrawal agreement. Whether in or out, it would not be as decisive anymore (even in the event of the application of Article 218, Article 207 TFEU shall rule trade agreements, and they would all have to be renegotiated, demanding colossal and completely unproductive efforts). This betrayal of the fundamental values and basic ideas underlying the EU (such as democracy and the equal treatment of all EU members) represents a deathblow. It is also possible that Chancellor Angela Merkel (who means well) is also part of this serious problem because she does not want to offend our British friends.

Whatever the case, the 27-member EU must interpret Article 50 TFEU in line with the European Union’s best interests. Indeed, it is a matter of survival. An exiting state cannot be responsible for determining the future development of European integration, in any form whatsoever.

The following clear guidelines for action for the 27-member EU should be applied immediately:

• The EU should be responsible for the interpretation of Article 50 TFEU and resolving the legal loopholes therein.
• In accordance with the options at hand, the EU should call upon the British government to issue its decision to withdraw from the EU as a result of the Brexit referendum, without any further hesitation and by the announced March deadline, notifying the EU of this fact as per Article 50 TFEU or announcing the final and binding decision of the British Parliament and British government not to withdraw from the Union by said deadline.
  In the latter case, the Brexit chapter would come to an end, without legal consequences, and the UK would remain in the EU as a full member. (However, in this case too, the concessions granted by the EU to Mr Cameron prior to the referendum to improve the chances of a “Remain” vote would not be viewed as a British acquis, despite the fact that no conditions were tied to them at the time.)
  The British government would then be in charge of explaining to British voters why it cannot or will not carry out the will of the majority. In that case, it is highly likely that new elections would have to take place in England because the government has repeatedly announced that it would implement the Brexit vote.
• If Britain does not formalise its intention to exit the EU by March 2017 or does not formally announce its wish to remain in the Union by that same date to the competent bodies of the EU, the latter will decide, acting by a qualified majority, that the withdrawal of Britain shall become effective in law with immediate effect on March 31 2017 as a result of the will of the majority of British voters. From that moment on, from the EU’s standpoint, Great Britain would become a third country which would not be party to a large number of the global agreements and treaties struck by the European Union, despite its own government’s lack of action.

The relations between the EU and England will be the object of a newly-negotiated treaty. If the UK formally notifies the EU of its withdrawal from the Union in accordance with Article 50 by 31 March 2017, a transition period of two years will be granted before the country’s exit from the Union is fully effective (this period may even be prolonged upon the EU’s unanimous decision). This will provide time to negotiate the future relations between Britain and the EU. The country’s exit from the Union, however, will take effect upon the termination of this transition period, whether the negotiations have been successful or not.

In my opinion, in line with the rationale of Article 50 TFEU and the above guidelines, British employees and civil servants working for EU institutions that are involved in paving the ground for political EU decisions or who can influence them should leave their posts immediately, be suspended or take early retirement. Commission President Juncker’s promise would have to be adapted accordingly.

Great Britain’s participation to covering these costs will have to be negotiated. This must definitely remain an obligation for the UK. The required removal should apply to Council members, MEPs and Commission members (the English Commissioner Lord Hill resigned from his position of his own volition following the Brexit vote, but he was substituted by Sir Julian King from the UK for the new Security Union portfolio), as well as to the Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee. Their expert knowledge may be required in the country’s delegation, however.

A special case is that of the former Portuguese President of the Commission, Mr Barroso, who has recently accepted a top position at Goldman-Sachs: he is supposed to represent the interests of the City of London in the upcoming negotiations. In addition to other matters of concern, his in-depth insider knowledge, network and contacts to individuals involved in the negotiations raise concerns about a conflict of interest benefiting the UK and harming the EU.

Mr Cameron’s referendum aimed to momentarily serve the cohesion of his own party but, as the result of the vote has demonstrated, it has done a disservice to both his country and the EU. The implementation (which is in principle unnecessary) of the British exit will require a great deal of effort and energy. It will have to be planned so as to harm the European citizens as little as possible. Otherwise, the fall of Europe shall be a reality.

This raises new issues about the advantages and disadvantages of direct and representative democracy. We must now hope that those involved will be strengthened by this experience – which could have been spared both at the side of the British and the side of the remaining Member States. No one can say that it is the EU’s fault: the EU can only exist if all those who entered it continue to construct it and participate, as well as grant it the necessary competences for common action. There are sufficient crises as it is.

Further to CESI’s contribution to the first phase of the consultation, the main messages relate to:

• a strengthened protection of women in the context of maternity leave – which includes an extension of the period of dismissal protection, the prohibition of preparatory steps to dismissal and the right to written reasons in cases of dismissal not related to pregnancy;

• longer and more flexible parental leave schemes that encourage an equal sharing of the take up of leave times between men and women;

• the introduction of a new carers’ leave which is designed in a flexible way so that it can respond to rapidly emerging and unforeseen domestic care needs; and

• more flexible working arrangements, which are implemented to the benefit of both workers and employers.

CESI’s full consultation contribution can be accessed here. More information about the consultation is available on the website of the European Commission.

The Presidium adopted the agenda of the Congress, clarified voting rules and discussed draft motions to be tabled. The purpose of motions, to be adopted at the Congress, is to provide guidance for the work of the General Secretariat until the next Congress.

Three topical main motions were discussed:

• A first motion on ‘The future of Europe – Investing in people’ will lay out CESI’s position on the impacts of ongoing and increasing digitalisation on the different forms of employment and on the working conditions of employees. The motion will also outline CESI’s view on how to address possible negative consequences of digitalisation on the work of trade unions, trade union membership and collective bargaining;
• A second motion on ‘Public services: Delivering results’ will make a case for well-equipped and well-resourced public administrations as a tool to provide public services in sufficient quantity and quality. The motion will argue that this is vital in order to manage key societal challenges of the future such as achieving a higher degree of social justice and effective internal security; and
• A third motion on ‘Digitalisation: Finding the balance will set out CESI’s vision of how important European challenges can be addressed, in particular in the field of employment and social affairs. Aspects that the motion will follow-up on include minimum social standards, gender equality, minimum wages, education and training, health, and the integration of migrants and the less advantaged.

The Presidium also endorsed further draft motions on specific changes to the Constitution and the governance of CESI as well as sector-specific draft motions submitted by CESI’s Trade Councils and Commissions. According to CESI’s statutes, the Presidium can table own draft motions to the Congress directly. Draft motions of Trade Councils and Commissions must be approved by the Presidium.

The main messages will be submitted to the European Commission as part of CESI’s contribution to the open consultation ‘Towards a European Pillar of Social Rights’. The main message relate in particular to:

• gaps in fields in which the EU has legislative competences, which should be closed via binding standards based on the highest level of job quality and protection for workers and citizens;

• lacking implementation and full enforcement EU legislation and rules, which should be addressed more decisively than is currently the case;

• meaningful indicators and enforceable benchmarks which should be put in place to achieve social progress in areas in which the EU has no clear legislative competence;

• tools for more public social investments to finance the social provisions set out by the Pillar; and

• a truly inclusive approach to full social partner involvement in the implementation, enforcement and eventual review(s) of the Pillar.

The main messages on the forthcoming Pillar are the basis for a more detailed and elaborate consultation response that will be submitted to the European Commission later this year.

The full text of CESI’s main messages, as adopted by the Presidium, can be accessed here.

The President of EUROMIL, Emmanuel Jacob, introduced the topic by highlighting the changed nature of military missions. Recent terrorist attacks in different European countries have changed the security situation and demonstrated the blurring lines between internal and external security. More than ever before, events outside Europe are having an impact on national security of European states. Politicians in many European countries reacted quickly on the manifold challenges and deployed military personal inside the country to protect public spaces, buildings and offices, to support the police, etc …

The Secretary General of CESI, Klaus Heeger, pointed to the main questions these internal deployments of military personnel raise: Under which conditions is the deployment of military personnel inside the country legal? Which specific tasks may be performed by the military and which not? Is the military trained and equipped to perform police-like security tasks? If not, which additional training is necessary?

Colonel Erwin Hoogland from the Dutch Ministry of Defence explained the particular situation in the Netherlands, where the police can request support from the military, and the military itself has military police branch. He elaborated on the legal aspects of this construction and emphasized that soldiers are not allowed to perform police tasks such as arresting people, if not under the supervision of a police officer. Captain Lars Scraeyen from the Belgian Royal Higher Institute for Defence stated that the law in Belgium strictly separates two kinds of homeland operations the military can execute. On the one hand there are safety operations (mostly to react on unintentional catastrophes) and on the other hand there are security operations (to deal with intentional catastrophes). Police forces can ask for military support when they lack capabilities or manpower to respond to a certain situation. Just like in the Netherlands, military forces – if assisting police forces – are legally not entitled to perform law and order tasks. The final responsibility over their deployment lies with the Minister of Interior. Mr. Thomas Sohst from the German Armed Forces Association (DBwV) explained the important historical distinction between internal and external security (forces) in Germany. The new White Book on Defence presented in summer 2016 foresees however joint training of military and police, to enable both forces to effectively work together in emergency situations. Mr. Sohst warned against an overreaction of the security forces as this could just be the intention of terrorists. He therefore advocated for a calm and rational approach as well as a clear distinction between internal and external security (forces).

During the questions and answers session, a lot of interesting issues were raised:

Lessons learnt from history

Panellists agreed that lessons have been learnt from past challenges. However, they pointed out that this is a very national process as States only learn effectively from their own history: Lessons learnt in other countries cannot easily be copy-pasted since there will always be cultural, legal and political differences.

Importance of intelligence sharing

To enable close and effective cooperation between different security forces, intelligence sharing is a key factor. However, as information flows are becoming increasingly fast and more difficult to validate, priority setting becomes more important.

Effective communication

Governments need to communicate decisions in an effective and transparent manner. While it is always easy to step up the presence of security forces, population might consider a downsizing with critical eyes. Especially when emotions and personal threat assessments are involved, transparent communication of governmental decisions is essential.

Way ahead

Despite the national differences the participants described during the event, their “wish lists” for the future were considerably similar. They hope to see more cooperation between the different security forces: Joint training and education would enable the lower and middle ranks of the different forces to get to know the mind-set and special situation of the others. Security measures discussed in an interdepartmental dialogue and jointly decided upon at the top-level would enhance the effectiveness and acceptance of the measures taken.

In his closing remarks, Gerrit Schlomach, Parliamentary Assistant to MEP Michael Gahler, welcomed the common ground identified during the discussion. He raised the question whether there is a role for the European Union to play which would go beyond being a platform for exchange of best practices. In this context he pointed to the report on a “European Defence Union” currently under discussion in the European Parliament, where the social dimension of security should be highlighted as well.

According to Klaus Heeger, Mr Juncker rightfully points out that pooling defence capabilities in the form of a permanent structured cooperation is the way forward if the EU wants to stay visible internationally in the area of security and the fight against terrorism. Unfortunately, any concrete follow-up is missing in the Bratislava roadmap. Absent from the summit, the UK hastily declared it would veto the creation of EU military capabilities so long as it remained a member of the bloc. “This may be an affront towards other Member States, especially given their possibilities to proceed with a permanent structure cooperation in the ambit of defence, even when disapproved of by a Member State.”

In relation to the refugee crisis, the major topic – the integration of refugees – has remained unaddressed. “Regardless of the competences of the EU, not addressing the integration of migrants also means not properly addressing important aspects of solidarity, values and security. A smooth integration of over a million refugees is key for Europe, its Member States and their societies”, Mr. Heeger deplored.

Klaus Heeger welcomed Mr Juncker highlighting the free movement of workers as a common European value, just as the fight against discrimination and racism. “CESI agrees that it is vital to realise the principle of non-discrimination for all mobile and posted workers in order to create fair working conditions for all. However, this also includes a proper and swift implementation and enforcement of EU law and rules in employment and social affairs without exception and at all levels. Actions should not be limited to a revision of legislative rules such as the posting of workers directive. Trade unions should be better supported in their efforts to establish transnational legal counselling and assistance networks as well as transnational mutual assistance agreements for all posted and mobile workers”, Klaus Heeger demanded.

As to Europe’s fight against terrorism and radicalisation, CESI has repeatedly underlined that education should become a social integration channel and a value transmission tool, a vector for values such as civil rights, democracy, fundamental rights, tolerance and respect, with the aim of giving people in the process of becoming radicalised a solid feeling of identity that would enable them to rebuild themselves and give them stable reference points. According to Klaus Heeger, the EU should further encourage action in this regard.

Mr Juncker’s perhaps most interesting announcement was his intention to implement the Stability and Growth Pact ‘with common sense’. “Hopefully, this means that the European Commission will finally work towards greater budgetary flexibility for the Member States when it comes to urgently needed social investments”, Klaus Heeger stated. In the past, CESI has repeatedly criticised the current application of the Stability and Growth Pact and the tools of the European Semester which too often obstruct efforts by Member States to invest socially. “Together with other stakeholders, CESI wants to constructively relaunch the discussion on the possibility to encourage, not hinder, social investments in the frame of economic governance and fiscal surveillance. In this regard, Mr. Juncker’s statement does hopefully to point to the right direction”, Klaus Heeger concluded.

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger said: “Even if the two reports are not legally binding, the recommendations they set out represent an important step forward in the political discussions on decent and fair working conditions all, which must finally become a reality. The reports will add pressure on the European Commission to finally deliver the Social Triple-A in Europe that President Juncker announced a long time ago.”

Social dumping: Boost the capacity of labour inspectorates and respond to the challenges of digitalisation

The report on social dumping in the European Union highlights some of the current problematics experienced by domestic and posted workers when confronted with a race to the bottom in terms of worker rights and job quality. It calls on the Member States to step up staffing levels and resources for their labour control bodies in order to make sure that they are adequately equipped to enforce (European) legislation. It also underscores the need for the social dimension to be taken on board in the Digital Single Market Strategy.

Work-life balance: Create better conditions for especially for working parents and carers of family members

The report on creating labour market conditions favourable for work-life balance stresses the importance of an adequate reconciliation of the professional and private life in particular for working parents and carers of family members. It calls for family-friendly working environments, reconciliation plans, return-to-work programmes, communication channels between employees and employers, and incentives for businesses and self-employed workers to ensure that people are not economically penalised for having children and that legitimate career aspirations are not opposed to family plans.

CESI was actively involved in the discourse on the reports during the negotatiation and adoption phase. Klaus Heeger added: “Many of CESI’s priorities are reflected in the two reports. We welcome the two votes of the European Parliament and hope they will bring a real difference.”

With Mary Collins from the European Women’s Lobby (EWL) as an expert speaker, the FEMM Commission focused predominately on CESI’s priorities concerning EU work-life balance policies. As part of a second-phase social partner consultation, CESI is currently in the process of compiling a written statement about the European Commission’s roadmap ‘New start to address the challenges of work-life balance faced by working families‘, to be submitted before September 30.

FEMM Commission: Gender pensions gap, work-life balance policy priorities and cooperation with the EWL

The FEMM Commission also heard a presentation by Ms Collins about the EWL’s new campaign on equal pensions, entitled ‘Together we can make it happen, equal pension rights for women now!‘. It was decided to contribute to this campaign with awareness-raising activities.

Discussing CESI’s membership at the EWL, the FEMM Commission concluded that cooperation has been very successful but that there is scope for more project-oriented collaboration between the two organisations.

SOC Commission: Towards a successful Pillar of Social Rights and a balanced New Skills Agenda

The SOC Commission concentrated its debates on main messages to be submitted to the European Commission in relation to a public consultation on a new European Pillar of Social Rights, proposed by the European Commission in March this year. Maria Luisa Llano Cardenal from the European Commission (DG EMPL) presented the latest developments and state of play of the consultation. Gilberto Pelosi from the Social Platform, the largest European-level umbrella organisation for social NGOs, presented the work his organisation has been doing in relation to the Pillar. Mr Pelosi and SOC Commission members agreed that any forthcoming Pillar can only bring real positive social outcomes for workers and citizens if it includes an effective implementation and enforcement mechanism in the Member States.

Michael Horgan, also from the European Commission (DG EMPL), was then invited for a presentation on the New Skills Agenda, an initiative published by the European Commission in June 2016. The SOC Commission members highlighted that the European Commission’s take on skills measures must not be overly utilitarian and based on economic necessities: Encouraging more civic education is just as important as adapting the teaching of skills to the needs of labour markets, SOC Commission members noted.

This was the last meeting of the FEMM/SOC Commissions before CESI’s Congress in December this year, after which both Commissions need to be formally reinstated by a newly elected Presidium.

Statement as PDF

Europe is at a crossroads, and the future of European cooperation and the benefits it brings are at stake. This is about the future of our society and how we want to be viewed by the wider world. The future of our planet and the kind of Europe our children will grow up in. The current crisis highlights the urgent need to reflect on fundamental questions: how do we ensure that the European project reclaims its promise of peace, democracy and solidarity? How can Europe work for its people?

Too many people across Europe are dissatisfied and disillusioned with the European Union and feel remote from its institutions and policies. But there are groups of committed politicians, trade unions, community groups and non-governmental organisations across Europe who are ready to take action and work for a renewed Europe. Together, we can shape a Europe that is inclusive, open, just, sustainable, and that works for people of all ages, social backgrounds and nations.

Where do we go from here to build the Europe we want and need?

Reject populist solutions

This crisis in confidence comes as people struggle with decreasing living standards, declining buying power and the rise of precarious work, hardship created by austerity policies, anxiety over movements of people to our shores, and the impacts of climate change and environmental destruction. As people search for answers, euroscepticism and nationalism, intolerance and misinformation are winning out over cooperation, humanity and solidarity with one other. We must all – leaders, media and individuals – actively and at every opportunity speak out and act against division, marginalisation of different groups in society and those that play on fears for their own political ends.

Tackle challenges together

Many of the challenges facing Europe – such as inequalities, climate change, natural resource depletion, and a global economy that benefits the few and not the many – are better tackled together than by countries individually.

The European Union, which embodies international cooperation and collaboration, needs to be leading in ensuring sustainable and inclusive development, advancing human rights, and allowing for dignified movements of people, where refugees are welcome and all people feel safe.

Fight for a sustainable, social Europe for people and for our planet

There needs to be a decisive and transformational change in political will, direction and policy. Such a vision is provided in the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, in which people, social justice, environmental and health protection, democracy and transparency take centre stage. Guided by this agenda, EU economic policies need to go hand in hand with strong social and environmental policies. The EU single market and international policies must promote enforceable rules to protect workers, consumers, all citizens – men and women, young and old – and the planet. EU policies must support democracy, dialogue and more equality within and beyond the EU. We need a Europe that aims at improving the living standards of everyone.

Work for better Europe, not less Europe

The current tendency to weaken EU institutions and to strip away protections for people and planet in the name of ‘deregulation’ is not the answer. Current economic policies of reducing deficits and boosting ‘competitiveness’ have promoted too narrow an interpretation of growth , and corporate profits have failed to make it into workers’ wages or trickle down to improve people’s lives.

It is these policies, not ‘too much Europe’, that have alienated people, leaving them feeling disempowered and left behind. We now need new, progressive European initiatives to deliver tangible benefits for people and to win back their confidence and trust. A ‘better Europe’ is where joint European action creates tangible benefits for people and planet. This includes a new focus on equality and inclusion, a relaunch of the European social model to provide decent work, quality jobs and better living conditions, strong environmental protection, meaningful action on climate change, and an EU-wide effort to welcome and integrate migrants.

Listen and engage

EU leaders, prime ministers, presidents, chancellors and parliamentarians must listen and engage actively with citizens of all ages and social backgrounds to understand and respond better to people’s concerns and propose a new, positive vision of Europe. Everyone, perhaps most importantly the young, needs to be more actively involved in decisions that have an impact on our future. Together, we can take the decisions and actions on the issues that matter.

Make the case for Europe

We need a genuine, democratic and inclusive dialogue on the future of Europe, and on how the EU can deliver tangible benefits for Europeans. We stand ready to play an active role in this dialogue, and to work even harder in making the case for the benefits that working together have brought to European citizens, and the values for which this Union stands.

This common statement was drafted on the initiative of WWF, CONCORD, ETUC and European Youth Forum, and supported by the following 177 signatories:

• European Confederation of Independent Trade Unions (CESI)
• ACT Alliance EU
• ACT Grupa
• ActionAid International
• Active Retirement Ireland
• ADG
• AEPADO – European Association for the Defense of Human Rights
• Africa e Mediterraneo
• AGE Platform Europe
• Alaturi de Voi Romania Foundation
• Albanian Society for All Ages (ASAG)
• All Ears TM
• ANME – Association for Natural Medicine in Europe
• arbeit plus – Social Integration Enterprises Austria
• Artenave Atelier – Associação de Solidariedade
• Asociación Nacional Presencia Gitana
• ASPUR
• ATDAL Over40
• Ateliere Fara Frontiere
• Atelierul de panza SRL
• Ateljee vzw
• Baby Milk Action/IBFAN UK
• BAGSO
• BirdLife Europe
• BirdLife Finland
• BirdLife The Netherlands
• BirdWatch Ireland
• BLOOM ASSOCIATION
• Bulgarian Red Cross
• CARE International
• CEIPES Belgium
• Centar za životnu sredinu/FoE Bosnia and Herzegovina
• Center for Equality Advancement
• Centre for Peace Studies, Zagreb
• CHEN, patient fertiltiy association, Israel
• Civil Society Europe
• Climate Action Network Europe
• COFACE Families Europe
• CONCORD
• Conference of Religious of Ireland and Irish Missionary Union
• Conseil de la Jeunesse
• Consorzio di cooperative sociali EVT
• Consorzio Sociale Abele Lavoro
• Coordination SUD
• CRIES
• Cultúr Migrants Centre
• Culture Action Europe
• Czech Society for Ornithology
• De Omslag
• Don Bosco International
• Don Bosco Youth Network West Africa
• Dynamo International – Réseau International des Travailleurs sociaux de rue
• EASPD
• EcoPolítica
• EFFAT
• ENAR – European Network Against Racism
• ENEA apa
• ENNA – European Network of National Civil Society Associations
• ENSIE – European Network of Social Integration Enterprises
• ERGO Network
• Estonian Green Movement
• Estonian Human Rights Centre
• Eurocadres – Council of European Professional and Manageral Staff
• Eurochild
• Eurodiaconia
• EuroHealthNet
• European Anti Poverty Network (EAPN)
• European Central Council of Homeopaths
• European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
• European Disability Forum
• European Environmental Bureau
• European Federation of Building and Woodworkers
• European Federation of Public Service Unions
• European Humanist Federation
• European Institute Foundation
• European Institute of Women’s Health
• European Medical Students’ Association
• European Movement International
• European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP)
• European Parents’ Association
• European Public Health Alliance
• European Race and Imagery Foundation (ERIF)
• European Trade Union Confederation
• European Transport Safety Council
• European Transport Workers’ Federation
• European Volunteer Centre (CEV)
• European Women’s Lobby
• European Youth Forum
• FAEDEI – Federación de Asociaciones Empresariales de Empresas de Inserción
• Fair Trade Advocacy Office
• FATEC (Federació d’Associacions de Gent Gran de Catalunya)
• FEANTSA
• Federació d’Organitzacions Catalanes de Gent Gran, Dones i Família – FOCAGG
• Fédération des entreprises d’insertion
• Fédération Européenne des Femmes Actives en Famille
• FEMS – European Federation Salaried Doctors
• Filipino Women’s Council
• FONSS – Federatia Organizatiilor Neguvernamentale pentru Servicii Sociale din Romania
• France Nature Environnement
• Friends of the Earth Cyprus
• Friends of the Earth Europe
• Friends of the Earth Finland – Maan ystävät ry
• Fundació Trinijove
• Fundación Jóvenes y Desarrollo
• Generation 2.0 Rights, Equality & Diversity
• Generation Earth
• Greenpeace
• HEAL – Health and Environment Alliance
• Hellenic Ornithological Society
• Housing Europe
• IBFAN Africa
• IBFAN Europe
• IBFAN LATIN AMÉRICA AND CARIBBEAN
• ICSW – International Council on Social Welfare
• IFSW-Europe – International Federation of Social Workers Europe
• IGLYO
• ILGA-Europe – European Region of the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex AssociationInitiative for Development and Cooperation
• Inter Environnement Wallonie
• International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN)
• International Disability and Development Consortium (IDDC)
• International Federation of Medical Students’ Associations (IFMSA)
• International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network
• International Union of Tenants (IUT)
• JURATRI
• KISA – Action for Equality, Support, Anti-Racism
• Latvian Ornithological Society
• Liga para a Protecção da Natureza
• Light for the World International
• Lipu BirdLife Italy
• Mayo Intercultural Action
• Mental Health Europe
• Migrant Tales
• Misiones Salesianas
• NABU – Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union (German partner of Birdlife International)
• National Youth Council of Ireland
• natur&emwelt
• Naturefriends International
• Natuurpunt
• Network of European LGBTIQ* Families Associations (NELFA)
• Northern Ireland Council for Ethnic Minorities
• Old’up
• OVN -NL
• Oxfam International
• PICUM – Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants
• Plan International
• Polish Society for the Protection of Birds
• QED Foundation
• RESIT – Rede de Empresas Sociais de Inserção pelo Trabalho
• Roma Community Centre Vilnius
• Slovenian Coalition for Public Health, Environment and Tobacco Control
• Social Firms England
• Social Platform
• SOF – BirdLife Sverige
• SOLIDAR
• SOS Children’s Villages International
• SOS/BirdLife Slovakia
• Sport Against Racism Ireland
• SST vzw
• Stichting Laka
• Tallinn Children’s Hospital Foundation
• The Club of Rome EU-Chapter
• The European Federation of Older Persons – EURAG
• The Integraiton and Support Unit
• The Oslo Times
• The Salvation Army EU Affairs Office
• Transport & Environment
• türkiye emekliler derneği
• UNI Europa
• volare a s.stefano
• Volonteurope
• WERVEL – Working Group for a Fair and Responsible Agriculture
• World Vision
• WWF
• YES Forum
• Youth for Human Rights Denmark
• Združenie Slatinka

Grant Agreement N° VS/2015/0350

“Well-being and occupational safety & health (OSH) in central government administrations: tackling psychosocial risks at work.”

Tender Specifications for video on well-being and occupation safety & health in central government administration : tackling psychosocial risks at work

Date of publication on CESI website: 01/07/2016

Deadline for submission: 30/09/2016

To be sent to: [email protected]

TENDER SPECIFICATION

Background

Central government administration employees and management are faced with a certain number of new challenges linked to psychosocial risks that have a direct impact on the well-being at work. Restructuring, the use of new technologies, the evolution of the workforce profile in central administrations and the growing exposure to violence from public service users represent new challenges in terms of psychosocial risks and can lead to serious illness such as burnout. Preventive risk assessment procedures and efficient chain of responsibility are therefore more than ever essential to improve well-being at work and help employees facing mental health problems.

Purpose of the Contract

The main aim of this contract is to provide project partners with a video illustrating the final outcomes of the project: a background study on psychosocial risk in central government administrations and a step-by-step guide providing common guidelines for risk assessment processes and for improving the deployment of the chain of responsibility. The video, in the form of a cartoon, should be a pedagogical tool to explain how to implement the recommendations (common risk assessment procedure and efficient chain of responsibility) when being confronted with psychosocial risk at work.

Tasks to be performed by the Contractor

The contractor will be expected to produce a 4-6 minutes video, in the form of an animation/cartoon. The main purpose of the video is to illustrate the guide drafted by the selected expert and in cooperation with the project steering committee. The video should be a pedagogical (guide user instructions), dynamic, creative and attractive tool. The video producer selected should create an original visual identity with adequate atmosphere, music and voices. The video should be addressed to employers line/middle managers and a broad range of national settings.

The video will be played on computers, mobile phones and tablets, and thus compatible with both technologies HTML5 and Flash.

The script of the video will be drafted in English in close cooperation with the project researcher and project steering committee, allowing for subtitles in 7 languages on a separate budget line (French, German, Spanish, Italian, Czech, Lithuanian and Greek).

Timetable

Duration of the project: November 2015 to May 2017 (18 Months) consisting of 5 stages.

The production of the video will kick in at the fourth stage of the project from October 2016 to February 2017.

REASONS FOR CONTRACTING OUT IMPLEMENTATION WORK:

None of the project partners has the in-house capacity and skills to produce a video in the form of an animation/cartoon. The project partners want to come up with a pedagogical tool addressed to managers and employees on the ground. Producing such a video requires special skills especially in terms of graphic design, visual identity creation and video production that the project partners don’t have at their disposal.

The project partners, in collaboration with the expert, will prepare the script of the video but an external expertise in terms of graphic design and video production is needed to ensure a quality final outcome.

SELECTION PROCEDURE:

Expertise required

The video producer will be expected to demonstrate that he has:

Knowledge of video production (with special skills in animation and cartoons)
Knowledge of graphic design, visual identity creation and subtitles insertion
Experience of producing video with specific requirements and script in English
Experience of working with strict deadline and multiple project partners

Selection criteria

The researcher(s) will be selected on the basis of the clear evidence they provide of how they meet the 4 criteria listed under expertise required (above).

Award criteria

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer whose offer represents the best value for money, taking into account the 4 selection criteria. It should be noted that the contract will not be awarded to a tenderer who receives less than 70% on the Award Criteria.

Content of the bids

The tenderer will ensure that their bid clearly identifies how they meet the selection criteria, ideally by indicating their knowledge and expertise under each of the relevant headings. It would also be useful to see examples of previous work that demonstrates their ability to produce this kind of outcomes/videos.

Presentation of the bids

The deadline for bids is 1 September 2016.

Fees

The fee is €13.000 incl. VAT (excluding travel and accommodation expenses that are covered by another project budget line)

Applications should be sent to Nadja Salson, [email protected]

CESI and EUROMIL

hereby invite you to the next

CESI@noon event

‘The use of military forces for internal security’

Tuesday 27 September 2016 – 1.00-3.00pm
Cocktail lunch at 12.30pm

CESI (European Confederation of Independent Trade Unions), Avenue de la Joyeuse Entrée 1-5, 1040 Brussels (Metro Schuman)

The event will take place in English / Register for the event here

***

With growing instability and armed conflicts at its doors, the EU is facing increasing numbers of terrorist attacks and elevated security threats. It has now reached a stage where the line between what is “internal” and “external” security is blurred.

In order to prevent and face further attacks, military forces are increasingly deployed inside the borders of some European countries. While this seems like a reassuring short-term solution, it raises many legal and political questions: Under which conditions is the deployment of military personnel inside the country legal? Which specific tasks may or may not be performed by the military? Is the military trained and equipped to perform police-like security tasks? Which additional training is necessary?

These and many more are the questions to be debated with the participants. The speakers will tackle these issues from a legal, political and a military personnel’s perspective.

Welcome:

Klaus Heeger, Secretary General of CESI
Emmanuel Jacob, President of EUROMIL

Discussion with the participation of:

Colonel Erwin Hoogland, Dutch Ministry of Defence
Captain Lars Scraeyen, Belgian Royal Higher Institute for Defence
Thomas Sohst, German Armed Forces Association

Moderation:

Klaus Heeger, Secretary General of CESI

Conclusions:

Michael Gahler, Member of the European Parliament

The Alliance, established in July 2013, gathers more than 150 stakeholders from 31 countries in the area of apprenticeships. The overarching objective is to engage in networking, cooperation and sharing of good practices in relation to quality apprenticeships.

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger said: “Some Member States already have long-standing and successful apprenticeship systems based on quality learning outcomes and good working conditions. As a European trade union confederation, we consider it a natural task to establish cooperation and interaction between the European Alliance for Apprenticeships and our national member organisations active in this field, so that best practices may be shared.”

As a trade union confederation representing the interests of more than 5 million public sector workers, including from national trade unions in the education sector, CESI has been actively following the work of the Alliance since its inception. CESI will, as an official partner of the Alliance, focus its work in particular on events and meetings on the promotion of the reputation of apprenticeship schemes, also in public administrations, and the commitment of teachers in this field.

More information about CESI’s involvement in the Alliance can be accessed through CESI’s pledge as published on the European Commission’s EAfA website.

Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, declared: “Member States cannot give tax benefits to selected companies – this is illegal under EU state aid rules. The Commission’s investigation concluded that Ireland granted illegal tax benefits to Apple, which enabled it to pay substantially less tax than other businesses over many years. In fact, this selective treatment allowed Apple to pay an effective corporate tax rate of 1 per cent on its European profits in 2003 down to 0.005 per cent in 2014.”

Indeed, according to the findings of an in-depth state aid investigation launched in June 2014, the tax rulings in question enabled Apple to avoid taxation on almost all the profits made in the entire EU Single Market by recording all sales in Ireland rather than in the countries where the products were sold.

The Apple case in Ireland, just like Starbucks in the Netherlands and Fiat in Luxembourg previously, is just another example of how harmful tax competition between EU Member States can be. Several hundred billion euros are lost annually by governments in Europe due to tax avoidance – even though many of them are struggling to finance basic public services and are in fact in dire need of taxes.

As CESI has repeatedly stated in the past, much still remains to be done to effectively fight harmful tax practices at the EU and international level and to restore trust in tax systems, namely:

• ensuring more transparency on tax rulings and public country-by-country reporting;
• creating sanctions for corporate tax dodging – So far, caught multinationals only pay what is due, so a deterrent effect is lacking; and
• adopting a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) which, by removing current mismatches between national systems, offers a holistic solution to the current problems with corporate tax avoidance in the EU.

International Youth Day was initially announced on December 17 1999 through a UN General Assembly resolution that went ahead endorsing the recommendations made by the World Conference of Ministers Responsible for Youth declaring August 12 as the day to celebrate youth across the globe. With a different theme each year, the 2016 Day focuses on the leading role of young people in ensuring poverty eradication and achieving sustainable development through sustainable consumption and production.

CESI affirms the need to work towards poverty eradication and ensuring that the youth can access education, training as well as employment. Young people are more likely to be forced into precarious employment, more than often jumping from one temporary contract to another and are experiencing a staggeringly high unemployment rate. As a comparison, the general unemployment rate within the 28 member states stands at 8,6% according to Eurostat figures, but the figure for young people dating from 2016 is 19,6%. This is unacceptable as the next generation should be the back bone of our societies.

As a trade union confederation, CESI reiterates its role as a social partner to encourage positive developments and calls for further investments into public services especially for the young.

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger said: “Public services provide for the necessary conditions for growth, employment and investment – for the population at large, but especially for our struggling youth. Over the last years, austerity and privatisation measures have proven harmful for social cohesion in Europe. However, despite the financial crisis that has gripped Europe leading to an even bigger need for more resources, public services have, during the last years, met with significant budget and personnel cuts and trends towards low pay and poor working conditions.”

CESI is of the opinion that the participation of trade unions in setting into motion European employment policies is crucial to ensure an effective implementation of such measures at the national level. This is especially important with regards to the Youth Guarantee where the implementation needs to be further enhanced and developed throughout Europe. Supporting a sustainable and inclusive recovery together with the implementation of an investment plan for jobs is a necessary pre-condition for improving the situation of young people in the labour markets.

Despite all the prophecies of doom, the European unification process is a truly marvellous feast that was born only thanks to the political will “from above”.

However, at the very latest since the Maastricht Treaty (which paved the way for the Euro), there have been some negative developments, which have gained prominence since the beginning of the financial and debt crises, and they have yet to be overcome. People’s passion for Europe has practically transformed into the opposite feeling. The recent Brexit decision could represent a new turning point. It is pointless to enumerate the errors made until present and analyse them individually. However, we cannot turn the clocks back or return to a point in the past before any of this occurred, to a “status quo ante”. Although the last words about the UK’s exit from the EU have not yet been pronounced, one must look ahead more than ever before. To do so, however, the remaining 27 Member States must agree on a clear common goal and share a joint position.

Learning without looking back in anger

The fact that the UK belongs to Europe was actually always a certain fact. The adhesion of the UK to the European Communities over forty years ago under a sheen of believing that one could participate in this union without restraint and even design it in cooperation with others in a constructive fashion soon proved to be the object of a yet unheard-of sabotage manoeuvre that has always deeply affected the integration process and the original Community and the later European Union. Why? In those days already, political decision-makers and their successors on the British Isles had already clearly made their minds up to stall all steps towards a political union in Europe. Ms Thatcher’s independent “I want my money back” has left a deep scar.

Unfortunately, many countries followed suit – including Germany, sadly – and were able to hide behind such positions. Bragging about European successes, “selling” them on one’s national territory as the achievements of the country’s leaders while blaming anything less attractive concerning common compromises on “Brussels” and Europe, and consequently on the European unification process; and speaking about EU workers in a negative light, denigrating them – these practices have damaged the reputation and image of Europe in our countries over the years. For a hopeful future for European integration, such attitudes must stop once and for all, both on the side of leaders and the media that support them, and a constructive, democratic position must be taken in order to begin walking a better, common path. This is a duty, not an unattainable objective.

For the future of Europe, more truthfulness is definitely required. The truths mentioned above about our recent common history must therefore be addressed “sine ira et studio”, and without bitterness or blame – because everyone is partly responsible.

It must be clear, however, that whoever commits to a now inevitable second attempt to achieve a new, precisely defined common goal cannot simply back out alone once it has been agreed upon. Dishonesty about Europe and broken promises must stop.

New challenges as a binding force

The new global challenges (climate change, debt crises, refugees, etc.) were identified a long time ago. They cannot be dealt with by Member States on their own, only if they act together.

Any other way would not have much impact. In this way, the effectiveness and commitment of our many invoked common values in Europe (as in “advanced” Western industrialised nations) have wasted away and diminished. We have indeed neglected to take care of those values and keep them alive (such as “democracy” and “human rights”, “reliability of administrative actions for the good of the people” and “social justice”). This is why we must resurrect our support of these values and try to experience them in an exemplary manner against a backdrop of truthfulness, if they are still to be binding in Europe and in every Member State. This is the case for the leading classes, who should lead by example, as well as all European citizens in the Member States.

When the European Communities were founded in the 1950s, the memory of the destruction caused by wars between nations in Europe influenced not only the unification concept of the founding fathers, but also other cross-border, integration-promoting forces, such as the convinced European Federalists, whose binding force between nation and language is often denied and underestimated from today’s viewpoint. The Member States’ agreed respect and rejection of all imperialistic expansion was already path-breaking and exemplary. We Europeans can still be proud of those actions to this day. Even other large regions of the world could benefit from them.

However, this does not change anything to the fact that a consensual identification of the common interests of the EU Member States has yet to be achieved. The large eastward enlargement of the EU following the fall of the Berlin Wall was simply too sudden and it happened too fast. In addition, it was not fully in compliance with the original concept drawn up by the six-member Community. This led to excessive expectations from the newly acceding countries… which were eventually dashed. Many of those countries did not immediately want to give up their newly-recovered freedom for the benefit of the European Union after the collapse of the Soviet Union either, in whatever form and whatever the advantages gained in return, although many of the Central and Eastern European countries aspired to belonging to the Union.

This fact must be taken into account too in a second attempt to strengthen the European construct.

Creation of a core Europe with political clout and capable of action at the centre of a larger European Union now counting 27 Member States

A conceivable, feasible way to strengthen and expand what has already been achieved could be the definition of a solution agreed upon by the Member States to abandon the idea of a blanket pace for the continuation of the EU as it now stands and the establishment of a concept for a strong core Europe that could act as an important player with equal rights on the global stage and convincingly reflect European values and its way of life, thus achieving an adequate, responsible potential for power and acknowledgement. The strength to take this step could also arise from the fact that this core Europe may already be proven to be real and embedded in today’s actual European Union, but it may have to be moderately reshaped (which could also be helpful when designing future relations with the British).

This so-called core Europe could be formed by the original six founding countries (France, Germany, Italy and the three Benelux states, i.e. Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg), as well as the two states in the Iberian Peninsula (Portugal and Spain) and Austria. So it could initially be composed of nine Member States, as long as the populations of the said countries agree with the concept and are willing to go along with it. If countries such as Austria and the Netherlands are not prepared to do so, the core would be smaller.

The remaining 18 countries of the EU (or more) would form a larger union in conjunction with the other core nine (or fewer), in which this stronger and more integrated future core Europe would be integrated. The potential 18 countries mentioned above that would lie outside the core Europe but that would still remain within a larger union (including countries such as Greece, Poland, Hungary or, if applicable, the UK) could adapt the European achievements to their more or less Eurosceptic desires (for instance in the sense of an initial restriction in terms of integration to free trade for these 18 countries) and achieve greater consolidation. This would not prevent a later accession to the core.

In this manner, the achievements of Europe (e.g. the Eurozone, Schengen and the remainder of the Western European Union, WEU) would be secured along concentric lines and ellipses. They could be adapted and may even be easier to manage.

On the other hand, the core Europe would have true common economic, foreign and defence policies, recognised common institutions, thus being a “political union”. Of course, the populations of the affected core countries would have to be asked about this concept and agree to it. On the other hand, in such a core Europe the subsidiarity principle and the expansion of the many value-building individual characteristics of the core countries and regions could be specified and further developed, in order to act as an example for “unity in diversity” – which should still be an aim.

In such a framework, a European identity could finally be forged in a gradual manner. It would emerge from greater identification with the larger European region in a multipolar world, which is where we are heading anyway. Everyone could find their place in that diversity, even in our national and cultural identities, without having to mortgage imaginable developments for the future. Today, no one can reliably say where the final borders of Europe in the east and south will be.

Basically, it is necessary to develop a concept for Europe by means of a realistic, sensible combination of “downsizing” and a greater “step forward” that does not exclude common perspectives, and in which unconditional Europeans, federalists and sovereigntists as well as eurosceptics can all find their place, and which can be supported by all affected population groups.

In this sense, the population totalling 500 million people (but which only represents 7 % of the global population!) could heartily say “Our future lies in Europe!” (where else?) with full heart and conviction once more. As to friends from the UK, the EU will be able to console itself on the basis of the fact that all countries from which the British ever withdrew developed successfully thereafter.

Grant Agreement N° VS/2015/0350

“Well-being and occupational safety & health (OSH) in central government administrations: tackling psychosocial risks at work.”

Tender Specifications for video on well-being and occupation safety & health in central government administration : tackling psychosocial risks at work

Date of publication on CESI website: 01/07/2016

Deadline for submission: 01/09/2016

To be sent to: [email protected]

TENDER SPECIFICATION

Background

Central government administration employees and management are faced with a certain number of new challenges linked to psychosocial risks that have a direct impact on the well-being at work. Restructuring, the use of new technologies, the evolution of the workforce profile in central administrations and the growing exposure to violence from public service users represent new challenges in terms of psychosocial risks and can lead to serious illness such as burnout. Preventive risk assessment procedures and efficient chain of responsibility are therefore more than ever essential to improve well-being at work and help employees facing mental health problems.

Purpose of the Contract

The main aim of this contract is to provide project partners with a video illustrating the final outcomes of the project: a background study on psychosocial risk in central government administrations and a step-by-step guide providing common guidelines for risk assessment processes and for improving the deployment of the chain of responsibility. The video, in the form of a cartoon, should be a pedagogical tool to explain how to implement the recommendations (common risk assessment procedure and efficient chain of responsibility) when being confronted with psychosocial risk at work.

Tasks to be performed by the Contractor

The contractor will be expected to produce a 4-6 minutes video, in the form of an animation/cartoon. The main purpose of the video is to illustrate the guide drafted by the selected expert and in cooperation with the project steering committee. The video should be a pedagogical (guide user instructions), dynamic, creative and attractive tool. The video producer selected should create an original visual identity with adequate atmosphere, music and voices. The video should be addressed to employers line/middle managers and a broad range of national settings.

The video will be played on computers, mobile phones and tablets, and thus compatible with both technologies HTML5 and Flash.

The script of the video will be drafted in English in close cooperation with the project researcher and project steering committee, allowing for subtitles in 7 languages on a separate budget line (French, German, Spanish, Italian, Czech, Lithuanian and Greek).

Timetable

Duration of the project: November 2015 to May 2017 (18 Months) consisting of 5 stages.

The production of the video will kick in at the fourth stage of the project from October 2016 to February 2017.

REASONS FOR CONTRACTING OUT IMPLEMENTATION WORK:

None of the project partners has the in-house capacity and skills to produce a video in the form of an animation/cartoon. The project partners want to come up with a pedagogical tool addressed to managers and employees on the ground. Producing such a video requires special skills especially in terms of graphic design, visual identity creation and video production that the project partners don’t have at their disposal.

The project partners, in collaboration with the expert, will prepare the script of the video but an external expertise in terms of graphic design and video production is needed to ensure a quality final outcome.

SELECTION PROCEDURE:

Expertise required

The video producer will be expected to demonstrate that he has:

Knowledge of video production (with special skills in animation and cartoons)
Knowledge of graphic design, visual identity creation and subtitles insertion
Experience of producing video with specific requirements and script in English
Experience of working with strict deadline and multiple project partners

Selection criteria

The researcher(s) will be selected on the basis of the clear evidence they provide of how they meet the 4 criteria listed under expertise required (above).

Award criteria

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer whose offer represents the best value for money, taking into account the 4 selection criteria. It should be noted that the contract will not be awarded to a tenderer who receives less than 70% on the Award Criteria.

Content of the bids

The tenderer will ensure that their bid clearly identifies how they meet the selection criteria, ideally by indicating their knowledge and expertise under each of the relevant headings. It would also be useful to see examples of previous work that demonstrates their ability to produce this kind of outcomes/videos.

Presentation of the bids

The deadline for bids is 1 September 2016.

Fees

The fee is €13.000 incl. VAT (excluding travel and accommodation expenses that are covered by another project budget line)

Applications should be sent to Nadja Salson, [email protected]

Troubled times ahead for the UK

Especially the UK will likely face troubled times: In British politics, the party landscape will change, with UKIP basically having lost its raison d’être (the departure from the EU) and Prime Minister Cameron having announced his resignation. Plus, in order to stay a member of the EU, pro-EU Scotland may strive anew for independence. Northern Ireland may join these efforts. As regards the economy, the future is just as unclear. The UK will have to negotiate new trade agreements with third countries. However, as a small entity (compared to the EU), the UK will have difficulties to strike favourable deals. And what will be the future economic relationship with the EU, which currently receives almost half of all British export goods and services? EU leaders have so far made clear that a new accession to the EU in the foreseeable future is not an option, and that negotiating cherry-picking such as a British access to the EU’s Single Market with exemptions where its suits the UK best is not acceptable. The EU will likely be tough on the UK. Great Britain could become Little England.

No panic in the EU

For the EU, the Brexit is certainly unfortunate. Especially in its foreign and security policy, the EU will lose weight. However, negotiations on challenges like migration management will remain difficult – with or without the UK. These were neither caused by the British nor will they be solved by the Brexit. What is true, however, is that the EU may struggle to carry on on these subjects for some time, given that Brexit negotations will absorb a lot of resources of the EU during the next years. At the same time, though, in fields in which UK governments have been difficult partners, such as in employment and social affairs, prospects for progress on files and initiatives like the labour mobility package or the Pillar of social rights may even increase.

The EU can also pre-empt a domino effect of exits by other Member States if it makes sure in the exit negotiations that ‘out’ really means ‘out’ and that no benefits can be expected from leaving the EU. In the future, citizens in other Member States may think twice before voting ‘Leave’ in theoretical future referenda.

The International Public Service Day is held under the auspices of the United Nations (UN) every year on June 23. On the occasion of this year’s edition, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said: “All countries and all people need a public service that is competent, equipped and well-resourced. Public service needs to be diverse and ethical. It needs to be dedicated to effectively serving people and improving the lives of the poorest and most vulnerable.”

CESI, too, wishes to recall and emphasise the paramount importance of accessible, affordable and qualitative public services to fulfill and respect human rights.

CESI Secretary General Klaus Heeger said: “Public services provide for the necessary conditions for growth, employment and investment and thereby guarantee inclusive, sustainable and democratic societies. But for efficient administrations, sufficient qualified and motivated staff is essential! However, despite the current crises actually requiring even more resources, public services have, during the last years, continued to suffer from significant budget and personnel cuts and trends towards low pay and poor working conditions. This makes their mission to provide effective services of general interest for the citizens difficult.”

He added: “Over the last years austerity and privatisation measures have proven harmful for social cohesion and social justice. Moreover, tax evasion and tax fraud have deprived governments from tremendous but essential resources. It is more than ever urgent to ensure that firms pay their fair share of tax and that states start investing in publicly owned public services again.”

One June 23, CESI’s Presidium adopted an appeal to the EU institutions on the functioning of public administrations in Europe. This appeal calls

• to consider safeguarding the proper functioning of public administrations as a priority objective, not subordinate to any other principle;
• to be clear that in public balances there must not be spending cuts which may put at risk the performance of public administrations;
• to encourage Member States more systematically to ensure adequate wages for public sector workers.

The full appeal can be accessed here (in English language). For other language versions, please see the policy positions section of CESI’s website.

The basic positioning paper, which is an update to a predecessor version of 2013, is structured in four parts.

The first part outlines the role of CESI as a European level trade union confederation in Brussels. It stresses that an increasing number of decisions and laws are struck and adopted on an EU level with concrete impacts on workers, and that this necessitates a European level representation of workers.

The second part sets out fundamental principles of CESI’s trade union activities. The section names non-partisanship, trade union pluralism, freedom and democracy as core principles that guide CESI’s work.

A third section lays out CESI’s particular strength in the representation of public sector workers. It calls for well-resourced public administrations as a guarantee for the citizens’ right to good administration.

Finally, a fourth section introduces CESI’s fundamental action strategies. In doing so, it defines the basic principles of interaction between the CESI General Secretariat and its member organisations and affiliates.

The entire positioning paper can be accessed here (in English language). It is also available in the policy positions section of CESI’s webpage in all five working languages of CESI (EN, DE, FR, ES, IT).