

While full-time permanent types of contract remain dominant throughout Europe, there has been a rising trend in atypical forms of contract, which are characterised in most cases by their precarious nature.
In this article, Ines Wagner dissects the differences between the Nordic, Continental, Liberal and Eastern European types of welfare systems with regards to workers’ access to social security protection, and giving practical examples on gender equality and migrant workers.
As Wagner highlights, a true challenge in accessing social security protection schemes nowadays lies within a necessity for a clear legal definition of what constitutes “work” and a “worker”.
Read the article in full here.
To learn more about this topic visit the #noprecariouswork website.
This project is mainly funded by funds from the European Union.

Image Gallery
Precarious employment and social protection systems, Ines Wagner
Related videos
Similar Posts
.png)
EU Recommendation on Housing: CESI Youth demands gaining ground
Yesterday, the Council adopted a Recommendation on addressing housing exclusion and homelessness, marking another step towards a stronger European response to the housing crisis - a concern especially of young persons and workers across Europe.
.png)
Trade unions demand better healthcare working conditions at Dialogue+ conference in Madrid
In Madrid, on 14 October 2026, the European Confederation of Independent Trade Unions (CESI), together with its Spanish member organisation SATSE, brought together trade union representatives and European stakeholders, including member of the European Parliament Alicia Homs and Eurofound, for a regional conference organised in the framework of the EU co-funded DIALOGUE+ project.
Get in touch
with us
Confédération Européenne des Syndicats Indépendants (CESI)
Contact form
Stay up to date
Don’t miss a thing and subscribe to our newsletter
Subscribe now and receive newsletters and much more!